Literature DB >> 10343652

Misrejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in primary and transformed human and rodent cells: a comparison between the HPRT region and other genomic locations.

K Rothkamm1, M Löbrich.   

Abstract

Many studies of radiation response and mutagenesis have been carried out with transformed human or rodent cell lines. To study whether the transfer of results between different cellular systems is justified with regard to the repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), two assays that measure the joining of correct DSB ends and total rejoining in specific regions of the genome were applied to primary and cancer-derived human cells and a Chinese hamster cell line. The experimental procedure involves Southern hybridization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis blots and quantitative analysis of specific restriction fragments detected by a single-copy probe. The yield of X-ray-induced DSBs was comparable in all cell lines analyzed, amounting to about 1 x 10(-2) breaks/Mbp/Gy. For joining correct DSB ends following an 80 Gy X-ray exposure all cell lines showed similar kinetics and the same final level of correctly rejoined breaks of about 50%. Analysis of all rejoining events revealed a considerable fraction of unrejoined DSBs (15-20%) after 24 h repair incubation in the tumor cell line, 5-10% unrejoined breaks in CHO cells and complete DSB rejoining in primary human fibroblasts. To study intragenomic heterogeneity of DSB repair, we analyzed the joining of correct and incorrect break ends in regions of different gene density and activity in human cells. A comparison of the region Xq26 spanning the hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase locus with the region 21q21 revealed identical characteristics for the induction and repair of DSBs, suggesting that there are no large variations between Giemsa-light and Giemsa-dark chromosomal bands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343652     DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8777(99)00008-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

1.  Heat effects on DNA repair after ionising radiation: hyperthermia commonly increases the number of non-repaired double-strand breaks and structural rearrangements.

Authors:  R A El-Awady; E Dikomey; J Dahm-Daphi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Analysis of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks misrepair is not compromized by broken DNA in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  G Alsbeih; W A Brock; N Terry; M D Story
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Ines Krüger; Larry H Thompson; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Enhanced fidelity for rejoining radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in the G2 phase of Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  Ines Krüger; Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Biotinylation of K12 in histone H4 decreases in response to DNA double-strand breaks in human JAr choriocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  Nagarama Kothapalli; Gautam Sarath; Janos Zempleni
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Markus Löbrich; Nicole Rief; Martin Kühne; Martina Heckmann; Jochen Fleckenstein; Christian Rübe; Michael Uder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The shape of the radiation dose response for DNA double-strand break induction and repair.

Authors:  Stephen Barnard; Simon Bouffler; Kai Rothkamm
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2013-03-22

8.  Radiosensitivity of human tumour cells is correlated with the induction but not with the repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  R A El-Awady; E Dikomey; J Dahm-Daphi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.