Literature DB >> 10343633

Crystalline silica exposure, radiological silicosis, and lung cancer mortality in diatomaceous earth industry workers.

H Checkoway1, J M Hughes, H Weill, N S Seixas, P A Demers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of silicosis as either a necessary or incidental condition in silica associated lung cancer remains unresolved. To address this issue a cohort analysis of dose-response relations for crystalline silica and lung cancer mortality was conducted among diatomaceous earth workers classified according to the presence or absence of radiological silicosis.
METHODS: Radiological silicosis was determined by median 1980 International Labour Organisation system readings of a panel of three "B" readers for 1809 of 2342 white male workers in a diatomaceous earth facility in California. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR) for lung cancer, based on United States rates for 1942-94, were calculated separately for workers with and without radiological silicosis according to cumulative exposures to respirable crystalline silica (milligrams per cubic meter x years; mg/m3-years) lagged 15 years.
RESULTS: Eighty one cases of silicosis were identified, including 77 with small opacities of > or = 1/0 and four with large opacities. A slightly larger excess of lung cancer was found among the subjects with silicosis (SMR 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 4.03) than in workers without silicosis (SMR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.57). An association between silica exposure and lung cancer risk was detected among those without silicosis; a statistically significant (p = 0.02) increasing trend of lung cancer risk was seen with cumulative exposure, with SMR reaching 2.40 (95% CI 1.24 to 4.20) at the highest exposure level (> or = 5.0 mg/m3-years). A similar statistically significant (p = 0.02) dose-response gradient was observed among non-silicotic subjects when follow up was truncated at 15 years after the final negative radiograph (SMR 2.96, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.08 at > or = 5.0 mg/m3-years), indicating that the association among non-silicotic subjects was unlikely to be accounted for by undetected radiological silicosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The dose-response relation observed between cumulative exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer mortality among workers without radiological silicosis suggests that silicosis is not a necessary co-condition for silica related lung carcinogenesis. However, the relatively small number of silicosis cases in the cohort and the absence of radiographic data after employment limit interpretations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343633      PMCID: PMC1745344          DOI: 10.1136/thx.54.1.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  14 in total

Review 1.  Exposure to crystalline silica and risk of lung cancer: the epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  H Weill; J C McDonald
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Indirect methods of assessing the effects of tobacco use in occupational studies.

Authors:  O Axelson; K Steenland
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Correlation between radiological and pathological diagnosis of silicosis: an autopsy population based study.

Authors:  E Hnizdo; J Murray; G K Sluis-Cremer; R G Thomas
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Meta-analysis of studies of lung cancer among silicotics.

Authors:  A H Smith; P A Lopipero; V R Barroga
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Silicosis and lung cancer in U.S. metal miners.

Authors:  H Amandus; J Costello
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr

6.  Asbestosis as a precursor of asbestos related lung cancer: results of a prospective mortality study.

Authors:  J M Hughes; H Weill
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1991-04

7.  Dose-response associations of silica with nonmalignant respiratory disease and lung cancer mortality in the diatomaceous earth industry.

Authors:  H Checkoway; N J Heyer; N S Seixas; E A Welp; P A Demers; J M Hughes; H Weill
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Mortality and lung cancer in ceramic workers in The Netherlands: preliminary results.

Authors:  J M Meijers; G M Swaen; J J Slangen
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and lung cancer.

Authors:  M Turner-Warwick; M Lebowitz; B Burrows; A Johnson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Lung cancer in relation to exposure to silica dust, silicosis and uranium production in South African gold miners.

Authors:  E Hnizdo; J Murray; S Klempman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.139

View more
  9 in total

1.  Impact of occupational carcinogens on lung cancer risk in a general population.

Authors:  Sara De Matteis; Dario Consonni; Jay H Lubin; Margaret Tucker; Susan Peters; Roel Ch Vermeulen; Hans Kromhout; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Neil E Caporaso; Angela C Pesatori; Sholom Wacholder; Maria Teresa Landi
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Mortality from lung cancer among silicotic patients in Sardinia: an update study with 10 more years of follow up.

Authors:  P Carta; G Aru; P Manca
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Silica, silicosis and lung-cancer: results from a cohort study in the stone and quarry industry.

Authors:  K Ulm; P Gerein; J Eigenthaler; S Schmidt; H Ehnes
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Respirable Crystalline Silica Exposure, Smoking, and Lung Cancer Subtype Risks. A Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies.

Authors:  Calvin Ge; Susan Peters; Ann Olsson; Lützen Portengen; Joachim Schüz; Josué Almansa; Thomas Behrens; Beate Pesch; Benjamin Kendzia; Wolfgang Ahrens; Vladimir Bencko; Simone Benhamou; Paolo Boffetta; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Neil Caporaso; Dario Consonni; Paul Demers; Eleonóra Fabiánová; Guillermo Fernández-Tardón; John Field; Francesco Forastiere; Lenka Foretova; Pascal Guénel; Per Gustavsson; Vikki Ho; Vladimir Janout; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Stefan Karrasch; Maria Teresa Landi; Jolanta Lissowska; Danièle Luce; Dana Mates; John McLaughlin; Franco Merletti; Dario Mirabelli; Nils Plato; Hermann Pohlabeln; Lorenzo Richiardi; Peter Rudnai; Jack Siemiatycki; Beata Świątkowska; Adonina Tardón; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; David Zaridze; Thomas Brüning; Kurt Straif; Hans Kromhout; Roel Vermeulen
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Is exposure to silica associated with lung cancer in the absence of silicosis? A meta-analytical approach to an important public health question.

Authors:  Thomas C Erren; Christine B Glende; Peter Morfeld; Claus Piekarski
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Longitudinal Characterization of Lung Structure Changes in a Yucatan Miniature Pig Silicosis Model.

Authors:  Emily Hammond; John D Newell; Samantha K N Dilger; Nicholas Stoyles; John Morgan; Jered P Sieren; Daniel R Thedens; Eric A Hoffman; David K Meyerholz; Jessica C Sieren
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 1.902

7.  The structure of volcanic cristobalite in relation to its toxicity; relevance for the variable crystalline silica hazard.

Authors:  Claire J Horwell; Benedict J Williamson; Ken Donaldson; Jennifer S Le Blond; David E Damby; Leon Bowen
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 8.  Silica exposure and work-relatedness evaluation for occupational cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Hyoung-Ryoul Kim; Boowook Kim; Bum Seak Jo; Ji-Won Lee
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-01-31

9.  Silica, silicosis and lung cancer: what level of exposure is acceptable?

Authors:  Maurizio Manno; Len Levy; Gunnar Johanson; Pierluigi Cocco
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 1.275

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.