BACKGROUND: The role of silicosis as either a necessary or incidental condition in silica associated lung cancer remains unresolved. To address this issue a cohort analysis of dose-response relations for crystalline silica and lung cancer mortality was conducted among diatomaceous earth workers classified according to the presence or absence of radiological silicosis. METHODS: Radiological silicosis was determined by median 1980 International Labour Organisation system readings of a panel of three "B" readers for 1809 of 2342 white male workers in a diatomaceous earth facility in California. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR) for lung cancer, based on United States rates for 1942-94, were calculated separately for workers with and without radiological silicosis according to cumulative exposures to respirable crystalline silica (milligrams per cubic meter x years; mg/m3-years) lagged 15 years. RESULTS: Eighty one cases of silicosis were identified, including 77 with small opacities of > or = 1/0 and four with large opacities. A slightly larger excess of lung cancer was found among the subjects with silicosis (SMR 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 4.03) than in workers without silicosis (SMR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.57). An association between silica exposure and lung cancer risk was detected among those without silicosis; a statistically significant (p = 0.02) increasing trend of lung cancer risk was seen with cumulative exposure, with SMR reaching 2.40 (95% CI 1.24 to 4.20) at the highest exposure level (> or = 5.0 mg/m3-years). A similar statistically significant (p = 0.02) dose-response gradient was observed among non-silicotic subjects when follow up was truncated at 15 years after the final negative radiograph (SMR 2.96, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.08 at > or = 5.0 mg/m3-years), indicating that the association among non-silicotic subjects was unlikely to be accounted for by undetected radiological silicosis. CONCLUSIONS: The dose-response relation observed between cumulative exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer mortality among workers without radiological silicosis suggests that silicosis is not a necessary co-condition for silica related lung carcinogenesis. However, the relatively small number of silicosis cases in the cohort and the absence of radiographic data after employment limit interpretations.
BACKGROUND: The role of silicosis as either a necessary or incidental condition in silica associated lung cancer remains unresolved. To address this issue a cohort analysis of dose-response relations for crystalline silica and lung cancer mortality was conducted among diatomaceous earth workers classified according to the presence or absence of radiological silicosis. METHODS: Radiological silicosis was determined by median 1980 International Labour Organisation system readings of a panel of three "B" readers for 1809 of 2342 white male workers in a diatomaceous earth facility in California. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR) for lung cancer, based on United States rates for 1942-94, were calculated separately for workers with and without radiological silicosis according to cumulative exposures to respirable crystalline silica (milligrams per cubic meter x years; mg/m3-years) lagged 15 years. RESULTS: Eighty one cases of silicosis were identified, including 77 with small opacities of > or = 1/0 and four with large opacities. A slightly larger excess of lung cancer was found among the subjects with silicosis (SMR 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 4.03) than in workers without silicosis (SMR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.57). An association between silica exposure and lung cancer risk was detected among those without silicosis; a statistically significant (p = 0.02) increasing trend of lung cancer risk was seen with cumulative exposure, with SMR reaching 2.40 (95% CI 1.24 to 4.20) at the highest exposure level (> or = 5.0 mg/m3-years). A similar statistically significant (p = 0.02) dose-response gradient was observed among non-silicotic subjects when follow up was truncated at 15 years after the final negative radiograph (SMR 2.96, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.08 at > or = 5.0 mg/m3-years), indicating that the association among non-silicotic subjects was unlikely to be accounted for by undetected radiological silicosis. CONCLUSIONS: The dose-response relation observed between cumulative exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer mortality among workers without radiological silicosis suggests that silicosis is not a necessary co-condition for silica related lung carcinogenesis. However, the relatively small number of silicosis cases in the cohort and the absence of radiographic data after employment limit interpretations.
Authors: Sara De Matteis; Dario Consonni; Jay H Lubin; Margaret Tucker; Susan Peters; Roel Ch Vermeulen; Hans Kromhout; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Neil E Caporaso; Angela C Pesatori; Sholom Wacholder; Maria Teresa Landi Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-03-31 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Calvin Ge; Susan Peters; Ann Olsson; Lützen Portengen; Joachim Schüz; Josué Almansa; Thomas Behrens; Beate Pesch; Benjamin Kendzia; Wolfgang Ahrens; Vladimir Bencko; Simone Benhamou; Paolo Boffetta; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Neil Caporaso; Dario Consonni; Paul Demers; Eleonóra Fabiánová; Guillermo Fernández-Tardón; John Field; Francesco Forastiere; Lenka Foretova; Pascal Guénel; Per Gustavsson; Vikki Ho; Vladimir Janout; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Stefan Karrasch; Maria Teresa Landi; Jolanta Lissowska; Danièle Luce; Dana Mates; John McLaughlin; Franco Merletti; Dario Mirabelli; Nils Plato; Hermann Pohlabeln; Lorenzo Richiardi; Peter Rudnai; Jack Siemiatycki; Beata Świątkowska; Adonina Tardón; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; David Zaridze; Thomas Brüning; Kurt Straif; Hans Kromhout; Roel Vermeulen Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Thomas C Erren; Christine B Glende; Peter Morfeld; Claus Piekarski Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2008-12-06 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Emily Hammond; John D Newell; Samantha K N Dilger; Nicholas Stoyles; John Morgan; Jered P Sieren; Daniel R Thedens; Eric A Hoffman; David K Meyerholz; Jessica C Sieren Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Claire J Horwell; Benedict J Williamson; Ken Donaldson; Jennifer S Le Blond; David E Damby; Leon Bowen Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 9.400