Literature DB >> 10343613

Use of bar code readers and programmable keypads to improve the speed and accuracy of manual data entry in the clinical microbiology laboratory: experience of two laboratories.

R Shaw1, J E Coia, J Michie.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the effect of the use of bar code readers and programmable keypads for entry of specimen details and results in two microbiology laboratories.
METHODS: The solutions selected in each laboratory are described. The benefits resulting from the implementation were measured in two ways. The speed of data entry and error reduction were measured by observation. A questionnaire was completed by users of bar codes.
RESULTS: There were savings in time and in reduced data entry errors. Average time to enter a report by keyboard was 21.1 s v 14.1 s for bar coded results entry. There were no observed errors with the bar code readers but 55 errors with keystroke entries. The laboratory staff of all grades found the system fast, easy to use, and less stressful than conventional keyboard entry.
CONCLUSIONS: Indirect time savings should accrue from the observed reduction in incorrectly entered data. Any microbiology laboratory seeking to improve the accuracy and efficiency of data entry into their laboratory information systems should consider the adoption of this technology which can be readily interfaced to existing terminals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343613      PMCID: PMC501008          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.52.1.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  6 in total

1.  User interface reengineering. Innovative applications of bar coding in a clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  K E Willard; C J Shanholtzer
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Speech recognition and direct data entry in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  S P O'Hara; R Athersuch
Journal:  Br J Biomed Sci       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.829

3.  Organizational approach to implementing bar-code technology in a university hospital.

Authors:  J E Smith; G E Meyer
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1987-03

4.  Use of bar code labels on collection tubes for specimen management in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  L L Tilzer; R W Jones
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Rapid accurate entry of microbiology results.

Authors:  R D Aller; W Friedman
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Cytology result entry without using the keyboard.

Authors:  R D Aller; C DeWitt
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.319

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Usability testing of digital pen and paper system in nursing documentation.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Paul Gorman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

2.  Readers' response and author's reply to "Laboratory results that should be ignored".

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Laboratory results that should be ignored.

Authors:  Dirk M Elston
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-10-11

Review 4.  Clinical microbiology informatics.

Authors:  Daniel D Rhoads; Vitali Sintchenko; Carol A Rauch; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Review of health information technology usability study methodologies.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Measuring the rate of manual transcription error in outpatient point-of-care testing.

Authors:  James A Mays; Patrick C Mathias
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.