Literature DB >> 10343209

A comparison of midazolam and diazepam for conscious sedation during colonoscopy in a prospective double-blind study.

S F Zakko1, H A Seifert, J B Gross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Midazolam and diazepam are commonly used for conscious sedation, but their comparative respiratory depressive effects have not been accurately studied. We used a novel real-time, on-line, computerized data acquisition system to compare the two agents in a randomized double-blind study.
METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing colonoscopy were studied. The maximum end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PetCO2) and the minimum oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO 2) were recorded by computer every minute. Patients received meperidine (25 to 50 mg) and incremental doses of either midazolam or diazepam to an identical end point of slurred speech and/or ptosis. Sedation was scored from 1 (unarousable) to 5 (wide awake).
RESULTS: Sedation scores were 3.6 +/- 0.1 (mean +/- standard error) after each agent. The doses of midazolam and diazepam were 0. 031 +/- 0.002 and 0.106 +/- 0.009 mg/kg, respectively. In the first 45 minutes (PetCO2) was significantly higher with midazolam than with diazepam (p < 0.05). SpO2 was significantly depressed for 80 minutes after each agent, and the number of minutes when the minimum Sp O2 was less than 90% did not differ between the two agents.
CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam was 3.4 times more potent than diazepam. The duration of oxygen desaturation emphasizes the importance of monitoring SpO2 until ventilation and oxygenation have recovered. Although the degree of hypoxemia was comparable, midazolam led to higher end-tidal carbon dioxide tensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343209     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70282-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  12 in total

1.  Sedation, analgesia, and monitoring.

Authors:  Travis F Wiggins; Abdul S Khan; Nathaniel S Winstead
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

Review 2.  How best to approach endoscopic sedation?

Authors:  Michaela Müller; Till Wehrmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of medications used for moderate sedation.

Authors:  Tong J Gan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? A randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam.

Authors:  Nik Hisamuddin Nik Ab Rahman; Ahmad Hashim
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-03-25

5.  Safety of midazolam for sedation of HIV-positive patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Authors:  E S Backman; V A Triant; J M Ehrenfeld; Z Lu; P Arpino; E Losina; R T Gandhi
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.180

6.  Clinical analysis of propofol deep sedation for 1,104 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a three year prospective study.

Authors:  Stojanka Gasparović; Nadan Rustemović; Milorad Opacić; Marina Premuzić; Andelko Korusić; Jadranka Bozikov; Tamara Bates
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Sedation regimens for gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Moon
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-03-31

Review 8.  Endoscopic sedation: from training to performance.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Lee; Chang Kyun Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-03-31

9.  Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for conscious sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: An open-label randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Priyanka Sethi; Sadik Mohammed; Pradeep Kumar Bhatia; Neeraj Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-01

10.  Assessment of propofol usefulness as an anesthetic agent during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Mr Ghadir; Mh Pishvaei; A Shafaghi; F Joukar; F Khatib; F Mansour-Ghanaei
Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis       Date:  2011-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.