S P Hardy1, R C Wilke, J F Doyle. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA. hardy@surgery.wisc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the percutaneous hollow needle technique for bone harvest to determine if morbidity from the bone donor site can be reduced significantly. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed evaluating all patients undergoing alveolar bone grafting at our institution from January 1992 through December 1996. Patients who underwent additional major procedures were excluded. Group I consisted of 12 patients in whom the percutaneous technique was utilized. The patients had an average age of 11.1 years (range: 8 to 15 years). Six were male and six were female. One had a bilateral cleft. Group II consisted of 15 patients in whom the conventional open technique for iliac crest bone harvest was used. They had an average age of 13.1 years (range: 7 to 31 years). Six were male and nine were female. Two had bilateral clefts. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. We evaluated intraoperative blood loss, total postoperative analgesia requirement, and length of hospital stay based on a retrospective hospital chart review. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between the two groups regarding intraoperative blood loss (group I: 83.3 cm3, group II: 208 cm3; p = .0015), postoperative total analgesia requirement (group I: 0.04 mg/kg, range: 0 to 0.17 mg/kg; group II: 0.34 mg/kg, range: 0.03 to 0.74 mg/kg; p = .0002), and length of hospital stay (group I: 1.0 days, group II: 2.13 days; p = .0001). There was no significant change in these results when bilateral clefts were excluded. CONCLUSION: Iliac bone graft harvest using the percutaneous hollow needle technique results in less blood loss, decreased postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stays compared with the open technique.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the percutaneous hollow needle technique for bone harvest to determine if morbidity from the bone donor site can be reduced significantly. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed evaluating all patients undergoing alveolar bone grafting at our institution from January 1992 through December 1996. Patients who underwent additional major procedures were excluded. Group I consisted of 12 patients in whom the percutaneous technique was utilized. The patients had an average age of 11.1 years (range: 8 to 15 years). Six were male and six were female. One had a bilateral cleft. Group II consisted of 15 patients in whom the conventional open technique for iliac crest bone harvest was used. They had an average age of 13.1 years (range: 7 to 31 years). Six were male and nine were female. Two had bilateral clefts. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. We evaluated intraoperative blood loss, total postoperative analgesia requirement, and length of hospital stay based on a retrospective hospital chart review. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between the two groups regarding intraoperative blood loss (group I: 83.3 cm3, group II: 208 cm3; p = .0015), postoperative total analgesia requirement (group I: 0.04 mg/kg, range: 0 to 0.17 mg/kg; group II: 0.34 mg/kg, range: 0.03 to 0.74 mg/kg; p = .0002), and length of hospital stay (group I: 1.0 days, group II: 2.13 days; p = .0001). There was no significant change in these results when bilateral clefts were excluded. CONCLUSION: Iliac bone graft harvest using the percutaneous hollow needle technique results in less blood loss, decreased postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stays compared with the open technique.
Authors: Carolyn E Schwartz; Julia F Martha; Paulette Kowalski; David A Wang; Rita Bode; Ling Li; David H Kim Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 3.186