Literature DB >> 10342266

Laboratory evaluation of biotic and abiotic factors that may influence larvicidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar. israelensis against two Florida mosquito species.

J K Nayar1, J W Knight, A Ali, D B Carlson, P D O'Bryan.   

Abstract

A technical powder of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar. israelensis (B.t.i.) (VectoBac TP, 5,000 international toxic units [ITU]/mg), an aqueous suspension (VectoBac 12AS, 1,200 ITU/mg), and a granular formulation (VectoBac CG, 200 ITU/mg) were tested in the laboratory under different biotic and abiotic, conditions for efficacy against larvae of saltwater (Aedes taeniorhynchus) and freshwater (Culex nigripalpus) mosquitoes. Second-, 3rd-, and 4th-instar larvae of Cx. nigripalpus were 1.3-3-fold more susceptible to both VectoBac TP and VectoBac 12AS than were the respective larval instars of Ae. taeniorhynchus. For each species, 2nd-instar larvae were several-fold more susceptible to these B.t.i. preparations than were the 4th instars. In test cups, larvae under lower densities exposed to B.t.i. concentrations sustained 5-9-fold higher mortalities than larvae under high-density conditions. VectoBac TP and VectoBac 12AS stayed in suspension for up to 24 h with similar larvicidal efficacy, which was greater at 32-35 degrees C than at 15-20 degrees C. At 60 degrees C maintained for 24 h, VectoBac 12AS was adversely affected 2-3-fold in terms of potency, but VectoBac TP was not affected. Significant loss of potency of both VectoBac 12AS and VectoBac TP occurred when exposed to 35-37 degrees C under high light intensity (140,000-170,000 lux) for 6 h. Increasing salinity levels from 0 (fresh water) to 50% sea water caused gradual efficacy declines of VectoBac 12AS and VectoBac TP against Ae. taeniorhynchus larvae. VectoBac CG caused insignificant initial and residual (up to 8 days) larval mortalities of both mosquito species. This formulation did not release the active ingredient of B.t.i. in any significant mosquito larvicidal concentration in surface layers of water, and the formulation was more effective in shallower water. Storage of all 3 formulations under constant laboratory and variable field conditions for up to 8 months did not produce detectable potency loss of these products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10342266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc        ISSN: 8756-971X            Impact factor:   0.917


  5 in total

1.  Characterisation of anopheline larval habitats in southern Malawi.

Authors:  Steven Gowelo; James Chirombo; Constantianus J M Koenraadt; Themba Mzilahowa; Henk van den Berg; Willem Takken; Robert S McCann
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 3.112

2.  Screening for feeding deterrent activity of herbal extracts against the larvae of malaria vector Anopheles subpictus Grassi.

Authors:  Gandhi Elango; Abdul Abdul Rahuman; Chinnaperumal Kamaraj; Asokan Bagavan; Abdul Abduz Zahir
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 2.383

3.  Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis against malaria mosquitoes in northwestern Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Peter Dambach; Valérie R Louis; Achim Kaiser; Saidou Ouedraogo; Ali Sié; Rainer Sauerborn; Norbert Becker
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Toxicity and affecting factors of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis on Chironomus kiiensis larvae.

Authors:  Chuan-Wang Cao; Li-Li Sun; Rong-Rong Wen; Xiao-Peng Li; Hong-Qu Wu; Zhi-Ying Wang
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.857

5.  Use of Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis as a viable option in an Integrated Malaria Vector Control Programme in the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana.

Authors:  Rita Nartey; Ellis Owusu-Dabo; Thomas Kruppa; Sandra Baffour-Awuah; Augustina Annan; Samuel Oppong; Norbert Becker; Kwasi Obiri-Danso
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.876

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.