Literature DB >> 10342098

Conventional and molecular methods for understanding probiotic bacteria functionality in gastrointestinal tracts.

S C Ricke1, S D Pillai.   

Abstract

The recent successes of probiotic application to limit colonization of foodborne pathogens in the gastrointestinal tracts of food animals ensures continued commercialization and widespread use of such cultures. Given that the the fermentation response and ecological balance of the probiotic consortium appears to be essential for the effectiveness of the cultures, it is essential to develop a methodology to accurately identify and quantitate these organisms during commercial production as well as successful in vivo colonization after administration. However, if further optimization of the effectiveness of defined cultures is to be achieved, methods to assess expression of key metabolic processes occurring during establishment of the probiotic culture as well as its subsequent ability to limit foodborne pathogen colonization are needed. Conventional methods to study individual probiotic gastrointestinal organisms include selective plating to identify specific nutritional groups, but the requirement of strict anaerobiosis for the obligate anaerobic members of these cultures can confound sample handling and preparation. Immunological methods can circumvent some of these problems but are somewhat limited for assessing functionality. The main advantage of using molecular tools is that the genetic diversity of the microflora, as well as their gene activity data are obtainable, both at the community level and at the single species level. Methods are currently available that permit studying individual members of microbial consortia, fluxes in community diversity, spatial distribution of consortia members, and the expression of specific microbial genes within communities. These methods involve the utilization of both DNA- and RNA-targeted probes, gene amplification protocols, and mRNA analysis. The study of mechanisms and functionality can only enhance the potential of probiotic cultures for limiting foodborne pathogen colonization.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10342098     DOI: 10.1080/10408419991299176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol        ISSN: 1040-841X            Impact factor:   7.624


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cultural and Immunological Detection Methods for Salmonella spp. in Animal Feeds - A Review.

Authors:  K G Maciorowski; P Herrera; F T Jones; S D Pillai; S C Ricke
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Microbial Ecology: Where are we now?

Authors:  Lisa A Boughner; Pallavi Singh
Journal:  Postdoc J       Date:  2016-11

Review 3.  Applications of In Ovo Technique for the Optimal Development of the Gastrointestinal Tract and the Potential Influence on the Establishment of Its Microbiome in Poultry.

Authors:  Stephanie M Roto; Young Min Kwon; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-08-17

4.  Original XPCTM Effect on Salmonella Typhimurium and Cecal Microbiota from Three Different Ages of Broiler Chickens When Incubated in an Anaerobic In Vitro Culture System.

Authors:  Si Hong Park; Sun Ae Kim; Sang In Lee; Peter M Rubinelli; Stephanie M Roto; Hilary O Pavlidis; Donald R McIntyre; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  The nasal microbiota in health and disease: variation within and between subjects.

Authors:  Kristi Biswas; Michael Hoggard; Ravi Jain; Michael W Taylor; Richard G Douglas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Differential effects of rice bran cultivars to limit Salmonella Typhimurium in chicken cecal in vitro incubations and impact on the cecal microbiome and metabolome.

Authors:  Peter M Rubinelli; Sun Ae Kim; Si Hong Park; Stephanie M Roto; Nora Jean Nealon; Elizabeth P Ryan; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A Review of Prebiotics Against Salmonella in Poultry: Current and Future Potential for Microbiome Research Applications.

Authors:  Andrew C Micciche; Steven L Foley; Hilary O Pavlidis; Donald R McIntyre; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-08-15

8.  Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP).

Authors:  Scot E Dowd; Todd R Callaway; Randall D Wolcott; Yan Sun; Trevor McKeehan; Robert G Hagevoort; Thomas S Edrington
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium by Fermentation Metabolites of Diamond V Original XPC in an In Vitro Anaerobic Mixed Chicken Cecal Culture.

Authors:  Peter Rubinelli; Stephanie Roto; Sun Ae Kim; Si Hong Park; Hilary O Pavlidis; Don McIntyre; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-09-16

10.  Microbial Populations in Naked Neck Chicken Ceca Raised on Pasture Flock Fed with Commercial Yeast Cell Wall Prebiotics via an Illumina MiSeq Platform.

Authors:  Si Hong Park; Sang In Lee; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.