Literature DB >> 10341856

Experience with transdermal testosterone replacement therapy for hypogonadal men.

S Parker1, M Armitage.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: None of the existing options for long-term testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) for hypogonadal men are ideal. Depot replacement at frequent intervals and implants are effective but invasive and inconvenient for the patient. Oral therapy results in poor hormone levels. Both are associated with undesirable metabolic changes. A transdermal formulation therefore represents a potential therapeutic advance for testosterone replacement.
OBJECTIVE: To carry out a clinical audit of the acceptability and efficacy as a treatment for hypogonadism of the first transdermal testosterone therapy available in the UK (Andropatch, SmithKline Beecham) compared with existing androgen replacement options. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Serum testosterone and questionnaire data on treatment efficacy, side-effects, therapy preference, sexual dysfunction and partner's attitudes to therapy were obtained from 50 hypogonadal men prescribed long-term testosterone replacement.
RESULTS: Eighty per cent of the men returned analysable questionnaires. Eighty-four per cent experienced adverse effects with transdermal therapy, most commonly dermatological problems; 22% of the sample elected to continue with transdermal therapy, 72% returned to depot and 5% returned to oral therapy. The reservoir patches were judged to be too large, uncomfortable, visually obtrusive and noisy. Testosterone levels were comparable to those obtained with depot replacement with the added advantage of a more physiological pharmacokinetic profile. Men taking oral preparations were consistently under-replaced.
CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events were substantially higher than reported from clinical trials but in keeping with the spectrum of yellow card reports received by the Committee on Safety of Medicines. The pharmacokinetic advantages are thus largely outweighed by low patient acceptability. In its present form transdermal therapy remains an expensive option for those who cannot tolerate depot testosterone replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10341856     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00596.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  7 in total

Review 1.  Bilateral testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Haşmet Sarıcı; Onur Telli; Muzaffer Eroğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-12

2.  Testosterone Therapy With Subcutaneous Injections: A Safe, Practical, and Reasonable Option.

Authors:  Maria Gabriela Figueiredo; Thiago Gagliano-Jucá; Shehzad Basaria
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Male hypogonadism: Symptoms and treatment.

Authors:  Peeyush Kumar; Nitish Kumar; Devendra Singh Thakur; Ajay Patidar
Journal:  J Adv Pharm Technol Res       Date:  2010-07

Review 4.  Androgen deficiency and the aging male: new urologic perspectives.

Authors:  R D McClure
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 5.  Testosterone for the aging male; current evidence and recommended practice.

Authors:  Roger D Stanworth; T Hugh Jones
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Pharmacokinetic Profile of Subcutaneous Testosterone Enanthate Delivered via a Novel, Prefilled Single-Use Autoinjector: A Phase II Study.

Authors:  Jed Kaminetsky; Jonathan S Jaffe; Ronald S Swerdloff
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.491

7.  Synchronous bilateral testis cancer: clinical and oncological management.

Authors:  Davide Campobasso; Stefania Ferretti; Antonio Frattini
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2017-03-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.