Literature DB >> 10341399

A screening program for trisomy 21 at 10-14 weeks using fetal nuchal translucency, maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A.

K Spencer1, V Souter, N Tul, R Snijders, K H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential impact of combining maternal age with fetal nuchal translucency thickness and maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in screening for trisomy 21 at 10-14 weeks of gestation.
METHODS: Maternal serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A were measured by Kryptor, a random access immunoassay analyzer using time-resolved amplified cryptate emission, in 210 singleton pregnancies with trisomy 21 and 946 chromosomally normal controls, matched for maternal age, gestation and sample storage time. In all cases the fetal crown-rump length and nuchal translucency thickness had been measured by ultrasonography at 10-14 weeks of gestation and maternal blood had been obtained at the time of the scan. The distributions (in multiples of the median; MoM) of free beta-hCG and PAPP-A (corrected for maternal weight) and fetal nuchal translucency (NT) were determined in the trisomy 21 group and the controls. Likelihood ratios for the various marker combinations were calculated and these were used together with the age-related risk for trisomy 21 in the first trimester to calculate the expected detection rate of affected pregnancies, at a fixed false-positive rate, in a population with the maternal age distribution of pregnancies in England and Wales.
RESULTS: In a population with the maternal age distribution of pregnancies in England and Wales, it was estimated that, using the combination of maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness and maternal serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A, the detection of trisomy 21 pregnancies would be 89% at a fixed false-positive rate of 5%. Alternatively, at a fixed detection rate of 70%, the false-positive rate would be 1%. The inclusion of biochemical parameters added an additional 16% to the detection rate obtained using NT and maternal age alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Rapid diagnostic technology like Kryptor, which can provide automated reproducible biochemical measurements within 30 min of obtaining a blood sample, will allow the development of interdisciplinary one-stop clinics for early fetal assessment. Such clinics will be able to deliver improved screening sensitivity, rapidly and more efficiently, leading to reduced patient anxiety and stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10341399     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13040231.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  25 in total

1.  First-trimester screening for Down syndrome in singleton pregnancies achieved by intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsuan Lai; Su-Chee Chen; Ming-Song Tsai; Fa-Kung Lee; Chi-Feng Wei
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Decision-making process of prenatal screening described by pregnant women and their partners.

Authors:  Inger Wätterbjörk; Karin Blomberg; Kerstin Nilsson; Eva Sahlberg-Blom
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  First trimester ultrasound: current approaches and practical pitfalls.

Authors:  Ozgur Oztekin
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Increased nuchal traslucency in normal karyotype fetuses.

Authors:  Roberta De Domenico; Marianna Faraci; Entela Hyseni; Fosca A F Di Prima; Oriana Valenti; Santo Monte; Elsa Giorgio; Eliana Renda
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-04

Review 5.  A historical and practical review of first trimester aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Melissa L Russo; Karin J Blakemore
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Prenatal diagnosis and fetal therapy--what lies in future?

Authors:  J Mauldin
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 7.  Down's syndrome screening: a controversial test, with more controversy to come!

Authors:  T M Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

9.  The assessment of nuchal translucency and serum markers for down syndrome screening with ductus venosus Doppler measurements in the first trimester.

Authors:  Ozlem Ozer; Cenk N Sayın; Füsun G Varol
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-12-01

10.  Record linkage to obtain birth outcomes for the evaluation of screening biomarkers in pregnancy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Samantha J Lain; Charles S Algert; Vitomir Tasevski; Jonathan M Morris; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.