Literature DB >> 10340907

Plasma urokinase receptor levels in patients with colorectal cancer: relationship to prognosis.

R W Stephens1, H J Nielsen, I J Christensen, O Thorlacius-Ussing, S Sørensen, K Danø, N Brünner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The proteolytic enzyme plasmin, which is generated from the precursor plasminogen by the action of urokinase plasminogen activator, is thought to play a role in tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is functionally involved in the cell surface activation (i.e., cleavage) of plasminogen. Increased tumor tissue levels of uPAR are associated with poor prognosis in several types of cancer. This retrospective study was undertaken to test the relationship between preoperative plasma levels of soluble uPAR (suPAR) and survival in patients with colorectal cancer.
METHODS: suPAR levels in preoperative plasma from 591 patients with colorectal cancer were determined by use of a kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and analyzed with respect to associations with postoperative survival, Dukes' stage, age, and serum carcinoembryonic antigen level. Plasma suPAR measurements were log transformed for survival analysis, which employed the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. All P values reported are two-sided.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis, using the log-transformed suPAR concentrations, demonstrated that there was an increasing risk of mortality with increasing plasma suPAR level (P<.0001). An arbitrary cut point, the median for all patients (1.37 ng/mL), divided patients with Dukes' stage B, C, or D disease into statistically different prognostic groups. In multivariate Cox analysis including Dukes' stage, age, and carcinoembryonic antigen level, the suPAR concentration independently predicted survival (P<.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative plasma suPAR level independently predicted survival of patients with colorectal cancer. Further studies of plasma suPAR in patients with cancer are needed to evaluate the utility of plasma suPAR measurements and cut points in identifying high-risk patients among those with early stage disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10340907     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/91.10.869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  56 in total

1.  Enzymatic function of multiple origins regulates the progression of colorectal cancer and the development of metastases.

Authors:  K A Paschos; D Canovas; N C Bird
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Ab initio molecular simulations for proposing novel peptide inhibitors blocking the ligand-binding pocket of urokinase receptor.

Authors:  Tatsuroh Mizushima; Takuya Sugimoto; Tomoyo Kasumi; Kohta Araki; Hiroshi Kobayashi; Noriyuki Kurita
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Tissue-type plasminogen activator activity in morphologically normal tissues adjacent to gastrointestinal carcinomas is associated with the degree of tumor progression.

Authors:  Gabriel Scicolone; Viviana Sanchez; Liliana Vauthay; Federico Fuentes; Alejandro Scicolone; Lorenzo Scicolone; Melina Rapacioli; Vladimir Flores
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Correlative studies on uPA mRNA and uPAR mRNA expression with vascular endothelial growth factor, microvessel density, progression and survival time of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Zhong-Sheng Zhao; Guo-Qing Ru; Jie Ma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Quantitative estimation of Serum Fibrinogen Degradation Product levels in Oral Premalignant and Malignant lesions.

Authors:  Leena Gharat; Govind P Rathod; Shilpa Kandalgaonkar
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-10-26

6.  Advantages of the AMDL-ELISA DR-70 (FDP) assay over carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for monitoring colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Andrea L Small-Howard; Holden Harris
Journal:  J Immunoassay Immunochem       Date:  2010

7.  Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor: Prognostic biomarker for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sanaz Memarzadeh; Katherine R Kozak; Lisbeth Chang; Sathima Natarajan; Peter Shintaku; Srinivasa T Reddy; Robin Farias-Eisner; Sanaz Memarzedeh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Transgenic mice demonstrate novel promoter regions for tissue-specific expression of the urokinase receptor gene.

Authors:  Heng Wang; John Hicks; Parham Khanbolooki; Sun-Jin Kim; Chunhong Yan; Yao Wang; Douglas Boyd
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Intact and cleaved forms of the urokinase receptor enhance discrimination of cancer from non-malignant conditions in patients presenting with symptoms related to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A F Lomholt; G Høyer-Hansen; H J Nielsen; I J Christensen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Co-detection of members of the urokinase plasminogen activator system in tumour tissue and serum correlates with a poor prognosis for soft-tissue sarcoma patients.

Authors:  H Taubert; P Würl; T Greither; M Kappler; M Bache; C Lautenschläger; S Füssel; A Meye; A W Eckert; H-J Holzhausen; V Magdolen; M Kotzsch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.