Literature DB >> 10340853

Angiogenesis during mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

N M Rowe1, B J Mehrara, J S Luchs, M E Dudziak, D S Steinbrech, P B Illei, G J Fernandez, G K Gittes, M T Longaker.   

Abstract

Recruitment of a blood supply is critical for successful bone induction and fracture healing. Despite the clinical success of distraction osteogenesis (DO), an analysis of angiogenesis during membranous bone DO has not been performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temporal and spatial pattern of angiogenesis during mandibular DO. The right hemimandible of adult male rats was osteotomized, and a customized distraction device was applied. Following a 3-day latency period, distraction was begun at a rate of 0.25 mm twice daily for 6 days (3.0 mm total; 12% increase in mandibular length). Three animals each were sacrificed on days 2, 4, and 6 of distraction (D1, D2, and D3 respectively), or after 1, 2, or 4 weeks of consolidation (C1, C2, and C3 respectively). Two experienced pathologists reviewed the regenerate histology, and angiogenesis was assessed by counting the number of blood vessels per intermediate-power field (IPF). Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance, with p < or = 0.05 considered significant. Results demonstrate that mandibular DO was associated with an intense vascular response during the early stages of distraction (D1). On average, 31.5+/-7.9 vessels were noted in each IPF examined during this time point. The number of blood vessels in the distraction regenerate decreased significantly during the later distraction time points, with approximately 14.0+/-2.0 and 14.7+/-3.5 blood vessels per IPF in sections obtained after days 4 and 6 of distraction (D2, D3) respectively. However, blood vessels at these time points took on a more mature histological pattern. During the consolidation period, the number of blood vessels noted in the regenerate decreased with 8.0+/-2.6, 9.3+/-2.1, and 4.0+/-2.0 vessels per IPF in sections obtained after 1, 2, or 4 weeks of consolidation (C1, C2, C3) respectively (p < 0.05 compared with vessel counts during the earliest distraction time point). This study demonstrates for the first time that an intense vascular response associated with mandibular DO occurs primarily during the early stages of distraction. The authors hypothesize that as distraction continues, newly formed vessels likely undergo consolidation, thus forming more mature vessels capable of withstanding distraction forces. Future studies will assess the effects of therapeutic interventions designed to increase angiogenesis during DO on bony regenerate formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10340853     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199905000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  15 in total

1.  Relationships between tissue dilatation and differentiation in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Michael T Longaker; Dennis R Carter
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.583

2.  Deferoxamine reverses radiation induced hypovascularity during bone regeneration and repair in the murine mandible.

Authors:  Aaron S Farberg; Xi L Jing; Laura A Monson; Alexis Donneys; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Sagar S Deshpande; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Value of ultrasonography for observation of early healing of humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Hai-Qing Su; Xiao-Qiang Zhuang; Yu Bai; Hai-Hong Ye; Xiao-Hua Huang; Bing-Bing Lu; Sheng-Lin Lu; De-Yi Nong; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 5.  Distraction histogenesis of the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Aydin Gülses; Metin Sencimen; Mustafa Ayna; Matthias Gierloff; Yahya Açil
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-18

6.  Fgf-9 is required for angiogenesis and osteogenesis in long bone repair.

Authors:  Björn Behr; Philipp Leucht; Michael T Longaker; Natalina Quarto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis demonstrates significantly increased vascularity in comparison to fracture repair in the mandible.

Authors:  Alexis Donneys; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Aaron S Farberg; Sagar S Deshpande; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Vascular analysis as a proxy for mechanostransduction response in an isogenic, irradiated murine model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Sagar S Deshpande; Alexis Donneys; Stephen Y Kang; Erin E Page; Peter A Felice; Lauren Kiryakoza; Noah S Nelson; Jose Rodriguez; Samir S Deshpande; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.514

9.  Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in Reconstruction of Condyle: Use of a 3D Model for Vector Planning.

Authors:  Aditya Mohan Alwala; Shravan Kumar Kasireddy; Bhargav Nalamolu; Santhosh Kumar Malyala
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-11-18

10.  Application of VEGFA and FGF-9 enhances angiogenesis, osteogenesis and bone remodeling in type 2 diabetic long bone regeneration.

Authors:  Christoph Wallner; Jessica Schira; Johannes Maximilian Wagner; Matthias Schulte; Sebastian Fischer; Tobias Hirsch; Wiltrud Richter; Stephanie Abraham; Ulrich Kneser; Marcus Lehnhardt; Björn Behr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.