Literature DB >> 10340838

The Hypertension Optimal Treatment study and the importance of lowering blood pressure.

L Hansson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Study had two objectives: (1) to define the optimal target blood pressure when treating hypertensive patients (i.e. the level of blood pressure associated with the lowest incidence of major cardiovascular events such as fatal and non-fatal stroke and myocardial infarction and other cardiovascular mortality); and (2) to assess the effect of a low dose of acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) compared with placebo on major cardiovascular events.
METHODS: The HOT study recruited 18 790 hypertensive subjects aged 50 to 80 years with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 100 and 115 mmHg (mean DBP 105 mmHg). Subjects were randomly assigned to be treated with the goal of reaching one of three target DBPs: < or = 90 mmHg (n = 6264), < or = 85 mmHg (n = 6264), or < or = 80 mmHg (n = 6262) using felodipine as initial therapy with the addition of other agents according to a 5-step regimen. In addition, subjects were randomly assigned to receive either 75 mg/day aspirin (n = 9399) or placebo (n = 9391).
RESULTS: DBP was reduced by 20.3, 22.3, and 24.3 mmHg in the < or = 90, < or = 85, and < or = 80 mmHg target groups, respectively. The incidence of all major cardiovascular events (fatal and non-fatal stroke, myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular mortality) decreased, although not significantly, in relation to the randomized target blood pressure. There were 84, 64, and 61 fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarctions in the < or = 90 mmHg, < or = 85 mmHg, and < or = 80 mmHg groups, respectively (P = 0.05). The overall effect of aspirin on cardiovascular events was positive, most noticeably on fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarctions; aspirin reduced events by 36%. There were seven fatal episodes of bleeding (two cerebral) in the aspirin group compared with eight (three cerebral) in the placebo group, and 129 versus 70 non-fatal major episodes of bleeding in the two groups, respectively. The lowest incidence of all major cardiovascular events combined was found at an achieved DBP of 82.6 mmHg and at an achieved systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 138.5 mmHg. In the subgroup with diabetes mellitus at baseline (n = 1501), the effect of intensive lowering of blood pressure was especially noticeable.
CONCLUSIONS: Most cardiovascular end-points showed a declining frequency in relation to target blood pressure. The optimal protection against combined major cardiovascular end-points was observed in the range 80-85 mmHg for DBP and in the range 130-140 mmHg for SBP. It is worth noting that 92% of all subjects reached a DBP of < or = 90 mmHg and that side-effects gradually declined from 16.9% at 3 months to 2.2% at the end of the study. A substudy showed that quality of life was linked to the level of blood pressure obtained: the lower the blood pressure, the better the quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10340838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl        ISSN: 0952-1178


  16 in total

Review 1.  What is the optimal strategy to intensify blood pressure control and prevent progression of renal failure?

Authors:  M Epstein; S Tobe
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Matching the right drug to the right patient in essential hypertension.

Authors:  M J Brown
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Position statement on use of pharmacological combinations in a single pill for treatment of hypertension by Argentine Federation of Cardiology (FAC) and Argentine Society of Hypertension (SAHA).

Authors:  Nicolás Renna; Daniel Piskorz; Diego Stisman; Diego Martinez; Ludmila Lescano; Sergio Vissani; Walter Espeche; Diego Marquez; Roberto Parodi; Diego Naninni; Marcos Baroni; Daniel Llanos; Rocio Martinez; Jessica Barochinner; Gustavo Staffieri; Fernando Lanas; Mónica Velásquez; Marcos Marin; Bryan Williams; Irene Ennis
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: 2018 update.

Authors:  Sheldon W Tobe; James A Stone; Todd Anderson; Simon Bacon; Alice Y Y Cheng; Stella S Daskalopoulou; Justin A Ezekowitz; Jean C Gregoire; Gord Gubitz; Rahul Jain; Karim Keshavjee; Patty Lindsay; Mary L'Abbe; David C W Lau; Lawrence A Leiter; Eileen O'Meara; Glen J Pearson; Doreen M Rabi; Diana Sherifali; Peter Selby; Jack V Tu; Sean Wharton; Kimberly M Walker; Diane Hua-Stewart; Peter P Liu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Metformin use among individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Lewis H Kuller
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Health-related quality of life in hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and coexistent chronic health conditions.

Authors:  Ritu K Soni; Anna C Porter; James P Lash; Mark L Unruh
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.620

Review 7.  Can we justify goal blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg in most hypertensives?

Authors:  Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Health-related quality of life outcomes in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Ritu K Soni; Steven D Weisbord; Mark L Unruh
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Association of 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Patterns with Cognitive Function and Physical Functioning in CKD.

Authors:  Lama Ghazi; Kristine Yaffe; Manjula K Tamura; Mahboob Rahman; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Amanda H Anderson; Jordana B Cohen; Michael J Fischer; Edgar R Miller; Sankar D Navaneethan; Jiang He; Matthew R Weir; Raymond R Townsend; Debbie L Cohen; Harold I Feldman; Paul E Drawz
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  New strategies for prevention of ischemic stroke: the LIFE study.

Authors:  Harold P Adams
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.