L DiPietro1, L D Katz, E R Nadel. 1. The John B. Pierce Laboratory, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine associations between overall adiposity, absolute and relative abdominal adiposity, and lipid concentrations in healthy older women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data. SUBJECTS: Subjects were 21 healthy, untrained older women (71 +/- 1 y) entering a randomized, controlled aerobic training program. MEASUREMENTS: Overall adiposity was assessed by anthropometry and the body mass index (BMI=kg/m2). Absolute and relative abdominal adiposity was determined by computed tomography (CT) and circumference measures. Fasting serum lipid concentrations of total-, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-, and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (C) and triglycerides (TGs) were determined by standard enzymatic procedures. RESULTS: Compared to the measures of overall adiposity, we observed much stronger correlations between measures more specific to absolute or relative abdominal adiposity and lipid concentrations. Visceral fat area was the strongest correlate of HDL-C (r = -0.75; P < 0.001) and the total-/HDL-C ratio (r = 0.86; P < 0.001). The abdomen-to-hip circumference ratio (AHR) was strongly correlated with TGs (r = 0.54; P < 0.01), HDL-C (r= -0.69; P < 0.001), and the total-/HDL-C ratio (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Excess abdominal adiposity remains an important correlate of lipid metabolism, even in healthy older women of normal weight. Thus, overall obesity is not a necessary condition for the correlation between excess abdominal fat and metabolic risk among postmenopausal women.
OBJECTIVE: To determine associations between overall adiposity, absolute and relative abdominal adiposity, and lipid concentrations in healthy older women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data. SUBJECTS: Subjects were 21 healthy, untrained older women (71 +/- 1 y) entering a randomized, controlled aerobic training program. MEASUREMENTS: Overall adiposity was assessed by anthropometry and the body mass index (BMI=kg/m2). Absolute and relative abdominal adiposity was determined by computed tomography (CT) and circumference measures. Fasting serum lipid concentrations of total-, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-, and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (C) and triglycerides (TGs) were determined by standard enzymatic procedures. RESULTS: Compared to the measures of overall adiposity, we observed much stronger correlations between measures more specific to absolute or relative abdominal adiposity and lipid concentrations. Visceral fat area was the strongest correlate of HDL-C (r = -0.75; P < 0.001) and the total-/HDL-C ratio (r = 0.86; P < 0.001). The abdomen-to-hip circumference ratio (AHR) was strongly correlated with TGs (r = 0.54; P < 0.01), HDL-C (r= -0.69; P < 0.001), and the total-/HDL-C ratio (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Excess abdominal adiposity remains an important correlate of lipid metabolism, even in healthy older women of normal weight. Thus, overall obesity is not a necessary condition for the correlation between excess abdominal fat and metabolic risk among postmenopausal women.
Authors: Jeffrey A Potteiger; Randal P Claytor; Mathew W Hulver; Michael R Hughes; Michael J Carper; Scott Richmond; John P Thyfault Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Johannes D Veldhuis; Roy B Dyer; Sergey A Trushin; Olga P Bondar; Ravinder J Singh; George G Klee Journal: Endocrine Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Stuart P Weisberg; Daniel McCann; Manisha Desai; Michael Rosenbaum; Rudolph L Leibel; Anthony W Ferrante Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Susan A Everson-Rose; Tené T Lewis; Kelly Karavolos; Sheila A Dugan; Deidre Wesley; Lynda H Powell Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2009-04-27 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: M N Moreira-Andrés; F J del Cañizo-Gómez; M A Losa; P Ferrando; A Gómez de la Cámara; F G Hawkins Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.256