Literature DB >> 10339646

Standard resection for cancer of the esophagus and cardia.

F H Ellis1.   

Abstract

Standard techniques of esophagectomy are the most common operations currently performed for cancer of the esophagus and cardia. A review of the recent literature discloses a wide difference in findings and postoperative results. A review of the findings and results in 505 operations for cancer of the esophagus on one surgical service from January 1, 1970 to January 1, 1997 reveals a resectability rate of 90%, a hospital mortality rate of 3.3%, a postoperative complication rate of 33.9%, and an adjusted actuarial 5-year survival rate of 24. 7%. As yet, neither the use of neoadjuvant therapy nor extended techniques or resection, even when applied only in patients with low-grade lesions, have provided convincing evidence of their superiority over standard resection techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10339646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am        ISSN: 1055-3207            Impact factor:   3.495


  8 in total

1.  Protagonist: endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  H Barr
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Secondary chemoprevention of Barrett's esophagus with celecoxib: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Elisabeth I Heath; Marcia Irene Canto; Steven Piantadosi; Elizabeth Montgomery; Wilfred M Weinstein; James G Herman; Andrew J Dannenberg; Vincent W Yang; Albert O Shar; Ernest Hawk; Arlene A Forastiere
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer, followed by chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hung-Chang Liu; Shih-Kai Hung; Charn-Jer Huang; Chung-Chu Chen; Ming-Jen Chen; Chun-Chao Chang; Cheng-Jeng Tai; Chi-Yuan Tzen; Li-Hua Lu; Yu-Jen Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  J Camilo Barreto; Mitchell C Posner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Esophagus and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Ricardo Londono; Blair A Jobe; Toshitaka Hoppo; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Multi-layered Free-form 3D Cell-printed Tubular Construct with Decellularized Inner and Outer Esophageal Tissue-derived Bioinks.

Authors:  Hyoryung Nam; Hun-Jin Jeong; Yeonggwon Jo; Jae Yeon Lee; Dong-Heon Ha; Ji Hyun Kim; Jae Hee Chung; Young-Sam Cho; Dong-Woo Cho; Seung-Jae Lee; Jinah Jang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Decellularized esophageal tubular scaffold microperforated by quantum molecular resonance technology and seeded with mesenchymal stromal cells for tissue engineering esophageal regeneration.

Authors:  Maurizio Marzaro; Gianantonio Pozzato; Stefano Tedesco; Mattia Algeri; Alessandro Pozzato; Luigi Tomao; Ilaria Montano; Filippo Torroni; Valerio Balassone; Anna Chiara Iolanda Contini; Luciano Guerra; Tommaso D'Angelo; Giovanni Federici di Abriola; Lorenzo Lupoi; Maria Emiliana Caristo; Ivo Boškoski; Guido Costamagna; Paola Francalanci; Giuseppe Astori; Angela Bozza; Andrea Bagno; Martina Todesco; Emanuele Trovalusci; Luigi Dall' Oglio; Franco Locatelli; Tamara Caldaro
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-10-04

8.  Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  O A Khan; J J Fitzgerald; I Soomro; F D Beggs; W E Morgan; J P Duffy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-05-19       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.