Literature DB >> 10338353

Urethral epithelial cells on the surface on hydrophilic catheters after intermittent catheterization: cross-over study with two catheters.

F Biering-Sørensen1, K Nielsen, H V Hansen.   

Abstract

AIM: To count the number of cells on the surface of the two commercial hydrophilic catheters, Lofric and EasiCath used for intermittent catheterization (IC) after 30-60 s in water without the necessity of catheter jelly. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty spinal cord lesioned (SCL) individuals. Six were women, and 14 men.
METHODS: IC was performed on average five times a day (range: 4-10). In a randomised cross-over design all catheterizations were performed either with Lofric or EasiCath in two consecutive 24 h periods. The catheter used for the last catheterization in each 24 h period was fixed, and divided into pieces of 5 cm. From each of these a piece with the length of 5 mm was taken for surface microscopy after staining. The total number of cells was counted without knowledge of the type of catheter. According to the fractionator principle an unbiased estimate of the total number of cells on the surface of the cateter was calculated.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the number of urethral epithelia cells on the catheters. No granulocytes were identified. The number of cells identified on the catheters were from 30 to > 10 000. No differences related to age, level of SCL, ASIA impairment scale, months since SCL or type of IC were found. There was a trend that women had higher cell counts than men.
CONCLUSION: No difference was found regarding number of urethral epithelial cells on the surface of the catheters after catheterization. This indicates no difference in urethral trauma between the two catheters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10338353     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  5 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association Best Practice Report: Catheter use.

Authors:  Lysanne Campeau; Samer Shamout; Richard J Baverstock; Kevin V Carlson; Dean S Elterman; Duane R Hickling; Stephen S Steele; Blayne Welk
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord lesions: treatment and prevention.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen; P Bagi; N Høiby
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Shamout; X Biardeau; J Corcos; L Campeau
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial.

Authors:  Frederik M Claassen; Francisco E Martins; Shingai B A Mutambirwa; Linda Potgieter; Lezelle Botes; Harry F Kotze; Francis E Smit
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 5.  A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention.

Authors:  Kim Bundvig Barken; Rikke Vaabengaard
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 2.090

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.