Literature DB >> 10338227

Test ordering guidelines can alter ordering patterns in an academic emergency department.

A Sucov1, J J Bazarian, E A deLahunta, L Spillane.   

Abstract

To determine the impact of an educational program designed to modify test ordering behavior in an academic Emergency Department (ED), an observational, before-and-after study was conducted at a university tertiary referral center and Emergency Medicine (EM) residency site. Test ordering standards were developed by EM faculty, RNs, and NPs based upon group consensus and published data. The standards were given to all ED staff beginning February 1996, and included in the evidence-based medicine orientation and educational program for all residents and medical students prior to beginning their rotation. No restrictions were placed on actual test ordering. The number of laboratory tests (total and individual) ordered per 100 patients decreased significantly after the educational program began for: total testing, CBC, and liver function test (LFT). In addition, declines during individual months for these tests were statistically significant. Prothrombin time and blood culture testing showed no significant decreases in test ordering frequency. Chemistry test ordering frequency showed statistically significant increases. Overall, approximately $50,000 was saved by decreasing test ordering. Test ordering behavior can be modified and maintained by an educational program and may have significant economic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10338227     DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00017-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pathology tests: is the time for demand management ripe at last?

Authors:  G Gopal Rao; M Crook; M L Tillyer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Readers' response and author's reply to "Laboratory results that should be ignored".

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Laboratory results that should be ignored.

Authors:  Dirk M Elston
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-10-11

4.  How are abnormal results for liver function tests dealt with in primary care? Audit of yield and impact.

Authors:  P Sherwood; I Lyburn; S Brown; S Ryder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-03

5.  Decoding laboratory test names: a major challenge to appropriate patient care.

Authors:  Elissa Passiment; James L Meisel; John Fontanesi; George Fritsma; Samir Aleryani; Marisa Marques
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Ordering patterns for laboratory and radiology tests by students from different undergraduate medical curricula.

Authors:  Sigrid Harendza; Lonneke Alofs; Jorike Huiskes; Marjo Wijnen-Meijer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.