BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is associated with phrenic block and diaphragmatic paralysis when high volumes (40-50 mL) of local anesthetic are injected. The goal of our study was to test if a low volume of local anesthetic administered while maintaining proximal digital pressure might more selectively block the brachial plexus and decrease the frequency of phrenic nerve block. METHODS:Twenty healthy patients undergoing ISB for orthopedic surgery of the upper extremity were randomly allocated to receive either 20 mL 1.5% mepivacaine while proximal digital pressure to the site of puncture was performed, or 40 mL 1.5% mepivacaine without digital pressure. Spirometry and clinical data were evaluated at baseline, 10, and 90 minutes after accomplishing the block and after the motor and sensory block resolved. Diaphragmatic excursion during deep inspiration was also evaluated 90 minutes after the block was performed, with the patient in the sitting position. RESULTS:Interscalene brachial plexus block produced diaphragmatic paralysis in all patients included in the study, as demonstrated by the pulmonary function testing and the chest radiograph. No significant differences were found in any of the parameters studied. At 10 minutes, baseline functional residual capacity had diminished by 34 +/- 10% in the 40 mL group and 37 +/- 13% in the 20 mL group. Maximum cephalad sensory dermatome level was also similar in both groups, being C 3 or above in all patients. Ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic motion was similar in both groups (3.2 +/- 2.3 cm in the 40 mL group and 2.6 +/- 1.7 cm in the 20 mL group). However, in no case was dyspnea manifested. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the volume of local anesthetic and applying proximal digital pressure to the site of injection is not effective in reducing the cervical block spread and the frequency or intensity of diaphragmatic paralysis during interscalene ISB.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is associated with phrenic block and diaphragmatic paralysis when high volumes (40-50 mL) of local anesthetic are injected. The goal of our study was to test if a low volume of local anesthetic administered while maintaining proximal digital pressure might more selectively block the brachial plexus and decrease the frequency of phrenic nerve block. METHODS: Twenty healthy patients undergoing ISB for orthopedic surgery of the upper extremity were randomly allocated to receive either 20 mL 1.5% mepivacaine while proximal digital pressure to the site of puncture was performed, or 40 mL 1.5% mepivacaine without digital pressure. Spirometry and clinical data were evaluated at baseline, 10, and 90 minutes after accomplishing the block and after the motor and sensory block resolved. Diaphragmatic excursion during deep inspiration was also evaluated 90 minutes after the block was performed, with the patient in the sitting position. RESULTS: Interscalene brachial plexus block produced diaphragmatic paralysis in all patients included in the study, as demonstrated by the pulmonary function testing and the chest radiograph. No significant differences were found in any of the parameters studied. At 10 minutes, baseline functional residual capacity had diminished by 34 +/- 10% in the 40 mL group and 37 +/- 13% in the 20 mL group. Maximum cephalad sensory dermatome level was also similar in both groups, being C 3 or above in all patients. Ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic motion was similar in both groups (3.2 +/- 2.3 cm in the 40 mL group and 2.6 +/- 1.7 cm in the 20 mL group). However, in no case was dyspnea manifested. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the volume of local anesthetic and applying proximal digital pressure to the site of injection is not effective in reducing the cervical block spread and the frequency or intensity of diaphragmatic paralysis during interscalene ISB.
Authors: V Bullmann; R Waurick; R Rödl; G Hülskamp; O Orlowski; H van Aken; W Winkelmann; T P Weber Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Craig T Hartrick; Yeong-Shih Tang; Don Siwek; Robert Murray; David Hunstad; Greg Smith Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Lars Bergmann; Stefan Martini; Miriam Kesselmeier; Wolf Armbruster; Thomas Notheisen; Michael Adamzik; Rϋdiger Eichholz Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 2.217