Literature DB >> 10337294

Radiopacity of compomers, flowable and conventional resin composites for posterior restorations.

M R Bouschlicher1, D S Cobb, D B Boyer.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to densitometrically determine the relative radiopacity (aluminum [Al]-equivalent values) of dentin, enamel, and 20 resin composite materials currently used for posterior restorations. Specimens 5 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick were fabricated from 20 materials (n = 7) for a total of 140 specimens. Human molars were longitudinally sectioned 2.0 mm thick to include both enamel and dentin. The optical densities of enamel, dentin, restorative materials, lead, and aluminum step wedge were obtained from radiographic images, using a transmission photodensitometer. The Al equivalent (mm) for each material was calculated from the linear regression equation of the log of normalized optical density and Al mm thickness obtained from the step wedge. A linear regression of the logarithm of normalized optical density and Al mm thickness was plotted (r2 = 0.9953), and the relative radiopacities, expressed as equivalent thickness of Al, were ranked ordinally. All materials tested, with the exception of an unfilled resin adhesive, complied with ISO Standard 4049, being at least as radiopaque as a 2.0 mm thickness of 99.6% pure Al. Four of six flowable composites had radiopacity values that fell between that of dentin and enamel, while two materials were more radiopaque than enamel. The three compomers tested had radiopacities greater than enamel. In addition, all traditional light- and chemical-cure resin composite materials tested were more radiopaque than enamel. All materials tested, with the exception of one adhesive resin, were at least as radiopaque as dentin and complied with ISO Standard 4049. Clinicians should be able to distinguish these restorative materials radiographically from recurrent decay, voids, gaps, or other defects that lead to clinical failure. Utilization of materials ranked more radiopaque than enamel would enable clinicians to distinguish the restorative material from tooth structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10337294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  11 in total

Review 1.  Flowable Resin Composites: A Systematic Review and Clinical Considerations.

Authors:  Kusai Baroudi; Jean C Rodrigues
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  In vitro analysis of the radiodensity of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems and its influence on the detection of cement overhangs.

Authors:  Carlos José Soares; Fernanda Ribeiro Santana; Rodrigo Borges Fonseca; Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins; Francisco Haiter Neto
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Influence of materials radiopacity in the radiographic diagnosis of secondary caries: evaluation in film and two digital systems.

Authors:  Ricardo Ferreira Pedrosa; I V Brasileiro; M L dos Anjos Pontual; A dos Anjos Pontual; M M F da Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Radiopacity of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Tomaž Hitij; Aleš Fidler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Study of the radio-opacity of base and liner dental materials using a digital radiography system.

Authors:  K M Lachowski; S B Botta; C A Lascala; A B Matos; M A P Sobral
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Radiopacity of restorative materials using digital images.

Authors:  Leda Maria Pescinini Salzedas; Mário Jefferson Quirino Louzada; Antonio Braz de Oliveira Filho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Radiodensity of base, liner and luting dental materials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Borges Fonseca; Carolina Assaf Branco; Paulo Vinícius Soares; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Alfredo Júlio Fernandes-Neto; Carlos José Soares
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  A study of composite restorations as a tool in forensic identification.

Authors:  Bahavathi Ananthan Hemasathya; Sundaresan Balagopal
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2013-01

9.  Digital radiographic evaluation of optical density of porcelains used for fabrication of inlay/onlay prosthesis.

Authors:  Júlio Cezar de Melo Castilho; Wilton Mitsunari Takeshita; Luis Roque de Araújo dos Santos; Luiz César de Moraes; Edmundo Medici Filho; Mari Eli Leonelli de Moraes
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Comparison of radiopacity of different composite resins.

Authors:  Pinar Gul; Fatma Çaglayan; Nilgün Akgul; Hayati Murat Akgul
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.