Literature DB >> 10337247

Prediction accuracy of soft tissue profile in orthognathic surgery.

B Mankad1, G J Cisneros, K Freeman, S B Eisig.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare soft tissue prediction accuracy of model surgery combined with computer software prediction with that of computer software prediction alone and to assess surgical accuracy by comparing the immediate postsurgical cephalogram with the planned movement of skeletal hard tissue. The predicted and actual soft tissue changes and the corresponding skeletal changes of 16 patients were compared using the Quick Ceph Image cephalometric treatment simulation software. A custom analysis was created to measure the hard tissue and soft tissue changes that occurred as a result of the surgical procedure. On average, the predictions were not significantly different from the actual postsurgical profile changes. Surgical changes of hard tissues from presurgery to postsurgery were accurate as planned except for the position of N-ANS. All lower soft tissue points moved significantly during treatment. Quick Ceph Image offers a rapid and reliable method of profile prediction that does not require artistic skill. If predictions are interpreted with caution and transferred accurately to the model surgery, they can provide an excellent visual aid during presurgical treatment planning and patient presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10337247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg        ISSN: 0742-1931


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of facial features and prediction of lip position in skeletal class III malocclusion adult patients undergoing surgical-orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Wenhsuan Lu; Guangying Song; Qiannan Sun; Liying Peng; Yunfan Zhang; Yan Wei; Bing Han; Jiuxiang Lin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations.

Authors:  Scott Tucker; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Martin Styner; Hyungmin Kim; Mauricio Reyes; William Proffit; Timothy Turvey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Facial surface morphology predicts variation in internal skeletal shape.

Authors:  Nathan M Young; Krunal Sherathiya; Luis Gutierrez; Emerald Nguyen; Sona Bekmezian; John C Huang; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Janice S Lee; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Factors influencing the accuracy of cephalometric prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Evangelia Chatzistavrou
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-07-07

5.  Virtual Planning of a Complex Three-Part Bimaxillary Osteotomy.

Authors:  Chiara Di Blasio; Marilena Laura Anghinoni; Alberto Di Blasio
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2017-11-28

6.  Development of novel artificial intelligence systems to predict facial morphology after orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Chihiro Tanikawa; Takashi Yamashiro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.