Literature DB >> 10337246

The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis.

T A Auger1, P K Turley.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have emphasized the importance of the facial profile in orthodontic treatment planning, with some arguing that the esthetic ideal has remained unchanged for thousands of years. To evaluate changes in the white female facial profile, we measured 14 soft tissue variables on profile photographs presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s. Five time frames were studied, with a sample of 25 photographs from each period corrected for size and orientation. Between-group differences were examined by use of analysis of variance, using a P value corrected for a multivariable analysis. Significant between-group differences (P < 0.0001) were found for anteroposterior lip position, amount of visible lip tissue, and interlabial angle, with the more recent groups displaying fuller and more anteriorly positioned lips. No significant differences were found for measurements calculated superior to subnasale (frontonasal angle, nasal tip angle, and nasolabial angle) or in the relationship of the chin to the upper face (total facial angle). The results of this study suggest that standards for the esthetic white female facial profile are not static and show a trend in this century toward fuller and more anteriorly positioned lips.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10337246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg        ISSN: 0742-1931


  13 in total

1.  Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive Chinese men compared to normal men.

Authors:  Feng Wu; Junfang Li; Hong He; Na Huang; Youchao Tang; Yuanqing Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

2.  Analysis of the Trend Toward Fuller Lips Among Fashion Models.

Authors:  Prem B Tripathi; Lauren Law; Marcela Dos Santos; Amrita Dhinsa; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

3.  Facial profile parameters and their relative influence on bilabial prominence and the perceptions of facial profile attractiveness: A novel approach.

Authors:  Erin Stewart Denize; Fraser McDonald; Martyn Sherriff; Farhad B Naini
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Evaluation of the facial dimensions of young adult women with a preferred facial appearance.

Authors:  Sae Yong Kim; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Yoon-Ah Kook; Ju Hee Kang; Kang Hyuk Kim; Hong-Beom Moon
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  A cross-sectional study of soft tissue facial morphometry in children of West Bengal.

Authors:  Badruddin A Bazmi; Shabnam Zahir
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-01

6.  Orthodontic-orthognathic interventions in orthognathic surgical cases: "Paper surgery" and "model surgery" concepts in surgical orthodontics.

Authors:  Narayan H Gandedkar; Chai Kiat Chng; Vincent Kok Leng Yeow
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Disparity in opinions on lip protrusiveness in contemporary African American faces.

Authors:  Yvette Battle; Monica Schneider; Laurence Magder; Eung-Kwon Pae
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Photogrammetric Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue Profile before and after Protraction Facemask Therapy in Class III Children (6-11 Years Old).

Authors:  Vahid Moshkelgosha; Arghavan Raoof; Ahmadreza Sardarian; Parisa Salehi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-03

9.  Influence of Age on Perception of Best Esthetical Profile.

Authors:  Parisa Salehi; Niloofar Azadeh; Negin Beigi; Mitra Farzin
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2019-03

10.  Numbers of Beauty: An Innovative Aesthetic Analysis for Orthognathic Surgery Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Tito Matteo Marianetti; Giulio Gasparini; Giulia Midulla; Cristina Grippaudo; Roberto Deli; Daniele Cervelli; Sandro Pelo; Alessandro Moro
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.