Literature DB >> 10336198

Rotator cuff: evaluation with US and MR imaging.

C J Seibold1, T A Mallisee, S J Erickson, M D Boynton, W G Raasch, M E Timins.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound (US) imaging are currently touted for assessment of rotator cuff disease. Optimum clinical imaging techniques include use of (a) a 1.5-T MR imaging unit with small planar coils, proton-density-weighted and T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences, and 10-12-cm fields of view (yielding 400-470 x 500-625-microm in-plane spatial resolution) and (b) a state-of-the-art commercial US unit with insonation frequencies of 9-13 MHz (yielding 200-400-microm axial and lateral resolution). Proper diagnosis requires familiarity with normal anatomic characteristics and imaging pitfalls. Care must be taken to avoid sonographic tendon anisotropy and MR imaging magic angle effects, which can be misinterpreted as rotator cuff tear. At MR imaging, a complete cuff tear typically appears as either a hyperintense defect or a tendinous avulsion that extends from the bursal to the articular side of the cuff; a partial cuff tear typically appears as a focal hyperintense region that contacts only one surface of the cuff. Complete and partial tears manifest with a wide spectrum of findings at US. MR imaging and US are effective for evaluating rotator cuff injuries, with high reported accuracies for detection of complete tears but more disparate results for detection of partial tears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10336198     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.19.3.g99ma03685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  15 in total

1.  Supraspinatus tendon tears: comparison of 3D US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation.

Authors:  Chang Ho Kang; Sam Soo Kim; Jung Hyuk Kim; Kyoo Byung Chung; Yun Hwan Kim; Yu-Whan Oh; Woong-Kyo Jeong; Baek Hyun Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The Rotator Interval - A Link Between Anatomy and Ultrasound.

Authors:  Giorgio Tamborrini; Ingrid Möller; David Bong; Maribel Miguel; Christian Marx; Andreas Marc Müller; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-08-23

3.  Detection and quantification of glenohumeral joint effusion: reliability of ultrasound.

Authors:  Veronika Zubler; Nadja Mamisch-Saupe; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Bernhard Jost; Marco Zanetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Ultrasound measurement of rotator cuff thickness and acromio-humeral distance in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome of the shoulder.

Authors:  Jerzy J Cholewinski; Damian J Kusz; Piotr Wojciechowski; Lukasz S Cielinski; Miroslaw P Zoladz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Gohar Abbas Naqvi; Mutaz Jadaan; Paul Harrington
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2009-10

6.  Sonography of the painful shoulder: role of the operator's experience.

Authors:  Thomas Le Corroller; Michel Cohen; Richard Aswad; Vanessa Pauly; Pierre Champsaur
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Ultrasonographic rotator-cuff changes in veteran tennis players: the effect of hand dominance and comparison with clinical findings.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Brasseur; Olivier Lucidarme; Marc Tardieu; Muriel Tordeur; Bernard Montalvan; Jacques Parier; Patrick Le Goux; Anne Gires; Philippe Grenier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Low accuracy of interpretation of rotator cuff MRI in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Robert A Sershon; Richard C Mather; Seth L Sherman; Kevin C McGill; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Detection of rotator cuff tears: the value of MRI following ultrasound.

Authors:  Matthieu J C M Rutten; Gert-Jan Spaargaren; Ton van Loon; Maarten C de Waal Malefijt; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Gerrit J Jager
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of MRI and MRA for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fanxiao Liu; Xiangyun Cheng; Jinlei Dong; Dongsheng Zhou; Shumei Han; Yongliang Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.