Literature DB >> 10336070

Up-regulation of Eph tyrosine kinase receptors after excitotoxic injury in adult hippocampus.

M T Moreno-Flores1, F Wandosell.   

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms underlying the response to injury in the central nervous system are incompletely understood. Many cell activation systems may be involved. Tyrosine kinase receptors and their ligands play key roles in cell activation throughout life. The Eph family of tyrosine kinase receptors/ ligands are developmentally regulated and have been implicated in neural pathfinding. However, nothing is known about their role in the adult brain. We have used a model of central nervous system lesion in the rat, in which intraventricular injection of kainate was performed. This produced neuronal death in the CA3-CA4 fields and glial activation in the hippocampus. Highly degenerate primers, corresponding to the catalytic domain of the tyrosine kinase family, were used for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of pooled RNA extracted from injured hippocampi. The amplified products were cloned and 100 clones (arbitrarily named TK1-TK100) were examined and inserts sequenced. We obtained four clones containing inserts which belong to the Eph receptor family. Two of these inserts (TK17 and TK63) were EphA4 and the other were EphB2 (TK25) and EphA5 (TK23). We performed in situ hybridization, and we found our clones to be present in all fields of the hippocampus, their expression being mainly neuronal. Three days after lesion, prominent expression appeared in CA1 as compared to the same field in the non-treated contralateral hippocampus. We performed northern blot analysis for quantification, and found that, three days after injury, the values decreased to 33 +/- 4%, 33 +/- 1% and 46 +/- 1% of control values for TK63 (EphA4), TK25 (EphB2) and TK23 (EphA5), respectively. Neuronal death in CA3-CA4 might account for this fact. Later, five days post-injury, the expression increased to 63 +/- 3%, 71 +/- 1% and 111 +/- 5% of control values, respectively. This increase was due to an up-regulation of these genes in the hippocampal neurons that survive after the injury, as indicated by in situ hybridization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10336070     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00568-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  11 in total

Review 1.  Can regenerating axons recapitulate developmental guidance during recovery from spinal cord injury?

Authors:  Noam Y Harel; Stephen M Strittmatter
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Expression profile and role of EphrinA1 ligand after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Luz C Arocho; Johnny D Figueroa; Aranza I Torrado; José M Santiago; Ariel E Vera; Jorge D Miranda
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  Expression and activation of ephexin is altered after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Odrick R Rosas; Johnny D Figueroa; Aranza I Torrado; Mónica Rivera; José M Santiago; Franchesca Konig-Toro; Jorge D Miranda
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.964

4.  Glial ephrin-A3 regulates hippocampal dendritic spine morphology and glutamate transport.

Authors:  Maria A Carmona; Keith K Murai; Lei Wang; Amanda J Roberts; Elena B Pasquale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reduction of EphA4 receptor expression after spinal cord injury does not induce axonal regeneration or return of tcMMEP response.

Authors:  Lillian Cruz-Orengo; Johnny D Figueroa; Aranza Torrado; Anabel Puig; Scott R Whittemore; Jorge D Miranda
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  EphB3 receptor and ligand expression in the adult rat brain.

Authors:  Christopher A Willson; Roy D Foster; Stephen M Onifer; Scott R Whittemore; Jorge D Miranda
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 3.156

7.  Dopaminergic axon guidance: which makes what?

Authors:  Laetitia Prestoz; Mohamed Jaber; Afsaneh Gaillard
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.505

8.  Two key residues in ephrinB3 are critical for its use as an alternative receptor for Nipah virus.

Authors:  Oscar A Negrete; Mike C Wolf; Hector C Aguilar; Sven Enterlein; Wei Wang; Elke Mühlberger; Stephen V Su; Andrea Bertolotti-Ciarlet; Ramon Flick; Benhur Lee
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Abundant expression of guidance and synaptogenic molecules in the injured spinal cord.

Authors:  Anne Jacobi; Anja Schmalz; Florence M Bareyre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Roles of Eph/ephrin bidirectional signaling in central nervous system injury and recovery.

Authors:  Jin-Shan Yang; Hui-Xing Wei; Ping-Ping Chen; Gang Wu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.