Literature DB >> 10335758

Radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular junction and pacemaker implantation versus modulation of atrioventricular conduction in drug refractory atrial fibrillation.

A Proclemer1, P Della Bella, C Tondo, D Facchin, C Carbucicchio, S Riva, P Fioretti.   

Abstract

Modulation of atrioventricular (AV) node conduction and radiofrequency ablation of AV junction are alternative approaches to control ventricular rate in drug refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). In 2 centers, 120 patients were treated either with AV junction ablation (center 1, group 1, 60 patients [30 men, aged 64 +/- 11 years], paroxysmal AF in 24 patients) or with modulation (group 2, 60 patients [32 men, aged 58 +/- 12 years], paroxysmal AF in 43 patients). In group 1, complete AV block was achieved in all patients. In group 2, the procedure was performed in sinus rhythm (30 patients), prolonging the Wenckebach cycle length from 328 +/- 85 to 466 +/- 80 ms (p <0.01) or during AF (30 patients), decreasing ventricular rate from 178 +/- 35 to 96 +/- 35 beats/min (p <0.01), and to <100 beats/min in 17 patients (61%). Complete AV block was induced in 9 of 60 patients (15%). In groups 1 and 2, at a follow-up of 27 +/- 7 and 26 +/- 6 months, there were 2 deaths (1 cardiac, 1 sudden death) and 1 death for end-stage heart failure, respectively. Hospital readmissions decreased from 3.2 to 0.2 and from 4.2 to 0.2/year; late AF recurrences at of >120 beats/min were documented in 6% and 12%, respectively. Symptom score analysis including effort and rest dyspnea, exercise intolerance, weakness, and palpitation showed a significant improvement in both treatment groups, when acutely effective, in patients with paroxysmal and/or chronic AF. In conclusion, ablation of the AV junction shows a higher acute success rate compared with modulation of the AV node conduction in patients with drug refractory AF. Depending on the acute success, both approaches therefore were similarly effective in achieving long-term ventricular rate control and symptom score improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10335758     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00121-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Avoiding Morbidity.

Authors:  Thomas D Callahan
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-12-16

Review 2.  Atrial fibrillation surgery for patients with rheumatic valve disease.

Authors:  Yosuke Ishii; Takashi Nitta
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Jayant Bagai; Boaz Avitall
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001-08

4.  Rate-control or rhythm-control: where do we stand?

Authors:  L Testa; G Trotta; A Dello Russo; M Casella; G Pelargonio; F Andreotti; F Bellocci
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2005-10-01

5.  Non-pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Ole-Gunnar Anfinsen
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2002-01-01

Review 6.  A review on atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing for heart rate control of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Konstantinos Vlachos; Konstantinos P Letsas; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Tong Liu; Michael Efremidis; Antonios Sideris
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.327

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.