Literature DB >> 10335683

Difficult patient encounters in the ambulatory clinic: clinical predictors and outcomes.

J L Jackson1, K Kroenke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One sixth of patient encounters are perceived as difficult by clinicians. Our goal was to assess clinical predictors and outcomes from such encounters.
METHODS: Five hundred adults presenting to a primary care walk-in clinic with a physical symptom completed surveys before the visit, immediately after the visit, at 2 weeks, and at 3 months. Patient measurements included mental disorders (PRIME-MD), functional status (Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey [SF-6]), satisfaction (RAND 9-item survey), symptom resolution, visit costs, previsit and residual expectations of care, and health services utilization. Measurements from the 38 participating clinicians included the Physician's Belief Scale and physician perception of encounter difficulty (Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire).
RESULTS: Seventy-four patient encounters (15%) were rated as difficult. Patients in such encounters were more likely to have a mental disorder (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.4), more than 5 somatic symptoms (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.8), and more severe symptoms (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.3). Difficult-encounter patients had poorer functional status, more unmet expectations (P=.005), less satisfaction with care (P=.03), and higher use of health services (P<.001). Clinicians with poorer psychosocial attitudes as reflected by higher scores on the Physician's Belief Scale experienced more encounters as being difficult (23% vs 8%; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with physical symptoms who are perceived as difficult are more likely to have a depressive or anxiety disorder, poorer functional status, unmet expectations, reduced satisfaction, and greater use of health care services. Physicians with poorer psychosocial attitudes are more likely to experience encounters as difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10335683     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.159.10.1069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  76 in total

1.  When your best is not good enough.

Authors:  Anne M Horgan; Sinead D Cuffe; Jennifer J Knox
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice.

Authors:  F M Hajjaj; M S Salek; M K A Basra; A Y Finlay
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Teaching medical students about communicating with patients with major mental illness.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni; Radhika A Ramanan; Stacey Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Somatic symptoms and depression: diagnostic confusion and clinical neglect.

Authors:  Christopher Dowrick; Cornelius Katona; Robert Peveler; Huw Lloyd
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  The impact of depressive symptoms on patient-provider communication in HIV care.

Authors:  Charles R Jonassaint; Carlton Haywood; Philip Todd Korthuis; Lisa A Cooper; Somnath Saha; Victoria Sharp; Jonathon Cohn; Richard D Moore; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2013-01-15

6.  Does a higher frequency of difficult patient encounters lead to lower quality care?

Authors:  Perry G An; Linda Baier Manwell; Eric S Williams; Neda Laiteerapong; Roger L Brown; Joseph S Rabatin; Mark D Schwartz; P J Lally; Mark Linzer
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Hostile sexist male patients and female doctors: a challenging encounter.

Authors:  Christina Klöckner Cronauer; Marianne Schmid Mast
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 8.  Patients presenting with somatic complaints: epidemiology, psychiatric comorbidity and management.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  A randomized trial of treatments for high-utilizing somatizing patients.

Authors:  Arthur J Barsky; David K Ahern; Mark R Bauer; Nyryan Nolido; E John Orav
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Non-specific, functional, and somatoform bodily complaints.

Authors:  Rainer Schaefert; Constanze Hausteiner-Wiehle; Winfried Häuser; Joram Ronel; Markus Herrmann; Peter Henningsen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.