Literature DB >> 10334762

Widening screening to detect Chlamydia trachomatis is more important than using DNA methods.

A Herring, O Caul, I Paul, P Horner.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10334762      PMCID： PMC1115789          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.318.7195.1416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  DNA methods should be used to detect Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; A J Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-28

2.  Evaluation of three Chlamydia trachomatis immunoassays with an unbiased, noninvasive clinical sample.

Authors:  I D Paul; E O Caul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal specimens from female commercial sex workers using a new improved enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  M Tanaka; H Nakayama; H Yoshida; K Takahashi; T Nagafuji; T Hagiwara; J Kumazawa
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Comparison of performance and cost-effectiveness of direct fluorescent-antibody, ligase chain reaction, and PCR assays for verification of chlamydial enzyme immunoassay results for populations with a low to moderate prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  D Dean; D Ferrero; M McCarthy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.948
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.