OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at investigating the influence of body size, body fat and sexual maturation on blood pressure (BP) in adolescents. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: A suburban student population of Southern Italy. SUBJECTS: One hundred ninety students attending the first and second year of a secondary school. Five were excluded because they were affected by major diseases. The remaining were 98 M and 87 F (mean age for either group = 12.0+/-0.8 y). METHODS: Blood pressure was measured by a mercury sphygmomanometer, body weight by a platform beamscale, other measurements included height, biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac skinfolds by a caliper; sexual maturation was evaluated according to Tanner. RESULTS: Body size was greater than in Tanner's population: in particular body weight (but not height) in our sample markedly exceeded that of the children of the same age in Tanner's population. Boys had higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) than girls (BP = 109/64+/-12/10 vs. 103/63+/-11/8 mm Hg, P<0.02 for SBP), while heart rate and waist/hip ratio were lower. During puberty evaluated on the basis of pubic hair growth BP in girls was higher than in the prepubertal phase (107/66+/-9/7 vs. 99/61+/-10/7, P<0.01). Pubertal boys showed a reduced percent of body fat (calculated from four skinfold measurements) in comparison to prepubertal ones (21.0%+/-4.5 vs. 24.5%+/-7.1, P<0.01). In linear correlation analysis, height, BW, BMI and lean body mass were found to be significantly associated with SBP in both sexes and to diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in girls. Percent body fat was correlated with SBP in boys, while sexual maturation was associated to SBP and DBP in girls only. Multiple regression analysis indicated a significant contribution of body size to BP variability, particularly in the girls. Sexual maturation was excluded from the final regression equations when height, BW or lean body mass were present. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that body weight in these adolescents is greater that in Tanner's population of the same age and sex. Body size appears to be a major determinant of BP, whereas sexual maturation seems to influence BP levels mainly through body growth. The influence of percent body fat on BP setting seems to be of limited importance.
OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at investigating the influence of body size, body fat and sexual maturation on blood pressure (BP) in adolescents. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: A suburban student population of Southern Italy. SUBJECTS: One hundred ninety students attending the first and second year of a secondary school. Five were excluded because they were affected by major diseases. The remaining were 98 M and 87 F (mean age for either group = 12.0+/-0.8 y). METHODS: Blood pressure was measured by a mercury sphygmomanometer, body weight by a platform beamscale, other measurements included height, biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac skinfolds by a caliper; sexual maturation was evaluated according to Tanner. RESULTS: Body size was greater than in Tanner's population: in particular body weight (but not height) in our sample markedly exceeded that of the children of the same age in Tanner's population. Boys had higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) than girls (BP = 109/64+/-12/10 vs. 103/63+/-11/8 mm Hg, P<0.02 for SBP), while heart rate and waist/hip ratio were lower. During puberty evaluated on the basis of pubic hair growth BP in girls was higher than in the prepubertal phase (107/66+/-9/7 vs. 99/61+/-10/7, P<0.01). Pubertal boys showed a reduced percent of body fat (calculated from four skinfold measurements) in comparison to prepubertal ones (21.0%+/-4.5 vs. 24.5%+/-7.1, P<0.01). In linear correlation analysis, height, BW, BMI and lean body mass were found to be significantly associated with SBP in both sexes and to diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in girls. Percent body fat was correlated with SBP in boys, while sexual maturation was associated to SBP and DBP in girls only. Multiple regression analysis indicated a significant contribution of body size to BP variability, particularly in the girls. Sexual maturation was excluded from the final regression equations when height, BW or lean body mass were present. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that body weight in these adolescents is greater that in Tanner's population of the same age and sex. Body size appears to be a major determinant of BP, whereas sexual maturation seems to influence BP levels mainly through body growth. The influence of percent body fat on BP setting seems to be of limited importance.
Authors: Aimin Zhang; Howard Hu; Brisa N Sánchez; Adrienne S Ettinger; Sung Kyun Park; David Cantonwine; Lourdes Schnaas; Robert O Wright; Hector Lamadrid-Figueroa; Martha Maria Tellez-Rojo Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Divanei Zaniqueli; Rafael de O Alvim; Marcelo P Baldo; Elis A Morra; José Geraldo Mill Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Patrícia Morais de Oliveira; Fabiana Almeida da Silva; Renata Maria Souza Oliveira; Larissa Loures Mendes; Michele Pereira Netto; Ana Paula Carlos Cândido Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr Date: 2015-10-09