Literature DB >> 10334549

Moral concerns of different types of patients in clinical BRCA1/2 gene mutation testing.

G Goelen1, A Rigo, M Bonduelle, J De Grève.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Implementing predictive genetic testing for a severe and common chronic disease such as breast cancer may raise unique ethical problems. Here we report on moral concerns experienced by patients in the setting of genetic counseling based on BRCA1/2 gene testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were members of breast or breast/ovarian cancer families in a consecutive series of 100 families who received counseling at a familial cancer clinic. The patients' moral concerns were identified using the grounded theory approach in the qualitative analysis of verbal transcripts of 45 counseling sessions. Included were sessions with patients who had breast and ovarian cancer, as well as their male and female relatives, before and after the specific BRCA1/2 gene mutation was identified in the family, and before and after those who opted for mutation analysis were informed of their carrier status.
RESULTS: There is an association of BRCA1/2 gene mutation carrier status and specific topics of moral concern. The moral preoccupations of patients with breast and ovarian cancer (probable carriers) related to their being instrumental in the detection of the specific mutation segregating in the family. The preoccupations of possible carriers concerned their own offspring. Individuals who tested positive (proven carriers) were concerned with issues of confidentiality. Patients who tested negative (proven noncarriers) were concerned with helping siblings and other relatives.
CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the moral concerns of subjects in the study sample may help health care providers be aware of the moral concerns of their own patients. This report may also contribute to the debate on predictive testing for familial adult-onset diseases from the patient's perspective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10334549     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  8 in total

1.  Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; R Eeles; A Ardern-Jones; V Murday; M Watson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

3.  Public perceptions of ethical issues regarding adult predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Douglas K Martin; Heather L Greenwood; Jeff Nisker
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-03-14

4.  Large, Prospective Analysis of the Reasons Patients Do Not Pursue BRCA Genetic Testing Following Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Sommer Hayden; Sarah Mange; Debra Duquette; Nancie Petrucelli; Victoria M Raymond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Men's decision-making about predictive BRCA1/2 testing: the role of family.

Authors:  N Hallowell; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles; C Foster; A Lucassen; C Moynihan; M Watson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  BRCA1/2 genetic testing uptake and psychosocial outcomes in men.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Rhoda Gatammah; Beth N Peshkin; Ayelet Krieger; Christy Gell; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  Patient perspectives of medical confidentiality: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pamela Sankar; Susan Mora; Jon F Merz; Nora L Jones
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Heather A Douglas; Rebekah J Hamilton; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.