Literature DB >> 10334538

Prospective study of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging of lymph node basins in melanoma patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy.

J D Wagner1, D Schauwecker, D Davidson, J J Coleman, S Saxman, G Hutchins, C Love, J T Hayes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of regional lymph node basins to sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I, II, and III melanoma localized to the skin.
METHODS: Patients with cutaneous melanoma with Breslow's depth greater than 1 mm (AJCC T2-4N0M0) or localized regional cutaneous recurrence (TxN2bM0) underwent whole-body imaging of glucose metabolism with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET followed by SNB. PET scans were interpreted in a blinded fashion and compared with histologic analyses of SNB specimens and clinical follow-up examination. Nodal tumor volumes were estimated.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine lymph node basins were evaluated by FDG-PET and SNB in 70 assessable patients. Eighteen patients (25.7%) had lymph node metastases at the time of FDG-PET imaging: 17 proved by SNB (24.3%) and one by follow-up examination (1.4%). Median tumor volume in positive sentinel node basins was 4.3 mm3 (range, 0.07 to 523 mm3). Sensitivity of SNB for detection of occult regional lymph node metastases was 94.4%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.6%. Sensitivity of FDG-PET was 16.7%, specificity was 95.8%, PPV was 50%, and NPV was 81.9%. At a median follow-up duration of 16.6 months, seven patients (10%) developed recurrent disease. PET predicted one recurrence (14.3%) in a node basin missed by SNB.
CONCLUSION: FDG-PET is an insensitive indicator of occult regional lymph node metastases in patients with melanoma because of the minute tumor volumes in this population. FDG-PET does not have a primary role for staging regional nodes in patients with clinically localized melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10334538     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  19 in total

Review 1.  Role of sentinel node biopsy in the management and staging of the N0 neck.

Authors:  Gary L Ross; Taimur Shoaib
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Atypical midface tumor complicating nevus of ota.

Authors:  René Patzwahl; Klara Landau; Spyros S Kollias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Direct comparison of [18F]FDG PET/CT with PET alone and with side-by-side PET and CT in patients with malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Felix M Mottaghy; Cord Sunderkötter; Roland Schubert; Petra Wohlfart; Norbert M Blumstein; Bernd Neumaier; Gerhard Glatting; Cueneyt Ozdemir; Andreas K Buck; Karin Scharffetter-Kochanek; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Impact of 2-deoxy-2[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography on the management of patients with advanced melanoma.

Authors:  Marion T Harris; Salvatore U Berlangieri; Jonathan S Cebon; Ian D Davis; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Prediction of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) positivity in patients with high-risk primary melanoma.

Authors:  Maria Danielsen; Andreas Kjaer; Max Wu; Lea Martineau; Mehdi Nosrati; Stanley Pl Leong; Richard W Sagebiel; James R Miller; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-09-22

6.  How morphometric analysis of metastatic load predicts the (un)usefulness of PET scanning: the case of lymph node staging in melanoma.

Authors:  G S Mijnhout; O S Hoekstra; A van Lingen; P J van Diest; H J Adèr; A A Lammertsma; R Pijpers; S Meijer; G J J Teule
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Routine use of FDG-PET scans in melanoma patients with positive sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  Janne Horn; Jørgen Lock-Andersen; Helle Sjøstrand; Annika Loft
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  A prospective analysis of positron emission tomography and conventional imaging for detection of stage IV metastatic melanoma in patients undergoing metastasectomy.

Authors:  Steven E Finkelstein; Jorge A Carrasquillo; John M Hoffman; Barbara Galen; Peter Choyke; Donald E White; Steven A Rosenberg; Richard M Sherry
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Tumour assessment in advanced melanoma: value of FDG-PET/CT in patients with elevated serum S-100B.

Authors:  Klaus Strobel; Jeannine Skalsky; Victor Kalff; Katrin Baumann; Burkhardt Seifert; Helen Joller-Jemelka; Reinhard Dummer; Hans C Steinert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Meta-analysis of the performance of (18)F-FDG PET in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Felisa Jiménez-Requena; Roberto C Delgado-Bolton; Cristina Fernández-Pérez; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Judy Schwimmer; José M Pérez-Vázquez; José L Carreras-Delgado
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.