PURPOSE: To test the validity-related evidence of a child and a parent symptom survey developed by the Convergence Insufficiency and Reading Study (CIRS) group. METHODS: A case comparison method was used to measure differences in symptoms between 14 school-aged children (ages 8 to 13 years) with Convergence Insufficiency (CI) and 14 children with normal binocular vision (NBV). RESULTS: A pooled t-test indicated that CI children and their parents scored higher than the NBV children and their parents on the child's survey (p<0.001) and parent's survey (p<0.001), respectively. CI children also scored significantly higher (p<0.03) on the Conners' Rating Scale for Parents. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the CIRS symptom survey is a valid instrument for differentiating CI children from those with normal binocular vision. Additionally, children in this age group were able to respond to a broad range of symptom questions associated with CI.
PURPOSE: To test the validity-related evidence of a child and a parent symptom survey developed by the Convergence Insufficiency and Reading Study (CIRS) group. METHODS: A case comparison method was used to measure differences in symptoms between 14 school-aged children (ages 8 to 13 years) with Convergence Insufficiency (CI) and 14 children with normal binocular vision (NBV). RESULTS: A pooled t-test indicated that CI children and their parents scored higher than the NBV children and their parents on the child's survey (p<0.001) and parent's survey (p<0.001), respectively. CI children also scored significantly higher (p<0.03) on the Conners' Rating Scale for Parents. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the CIRS symptom survey is a valid instrument for differentiating CI children from those with normal binocular vision. Additionally, children in this age group were able to respond to a broad range of symptom questions associated with CI.
Authors: Mitchell Scheiman; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Susan Cotter; G Lynn Mitchell; Michael Gallaway; Mark Boas; Rachel Coulter; Kristine Hopkins; Susanna Tamkins Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Eric Borsting; G Lynn Mitchell; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Mitchell Scheiman; Deborah M Amster; Susan Cotter; Rachael A Coulter; Gregory Fecho; Michael F Gallaway; David Granet; Richard Hertle; Jacqueline Rodena; Tomohiko Yamada Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Michael Rouse; Eric Borsting; G Lynn Mitchell; Susan A Cotter; Marjean Kulp; Mitchell Scheiman; Carmen Barnhardt; Annette Bade; Tomohiko Yamada; Tomohike Yamada Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Carmen Barnhardt; Susan A Cotter; G Lynn Mitchell; Mitchell Scheiman; Marjean T Kulp Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Mitchell Scheiman; G Lynn Mitchell; Susan A Cotter; Marjean Kulp; Christopher Chase; Eric Borsting; Eugene Arnold; Carolyn Denton; Richard Hertle Journal: Vis Dev Rehabil Date: 2015-10