Literature DB >> 10333012

Comparison of the depression of H-reflexes following previous activation in upper and lower limb muscles in human subjects.

C Rossi-Durand1, K E Jones, S Adams, P Bawa.   

Abstract

When conditioning-testing (C-T) stimuli are applied to Ia afferents to elicit H-reflexes, the test reflex is abolished immediately following the conditioning reflex. As the C-T interval is increased, the test response slowly begins to recover, taking several hundred milliseconds to attain control values. The time course of this recovery is known as the H-reflex recovery curve. H-reflex recovery curves were compared using surface EMG and single motor unit activities in lower limb soleus and upper limb flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles in seven healthy human subjects. Under rest conditions, the recovery of H-reflexes and single motor unit activity was slow for soleus; the recovery was not complete even in 1 s. In comparison, the recovery was very fast for FCR motor units, occurring in 200-300 ms. The effects of rate of stimulation (0.1-10.0 imp/s) were also examined on the magnitude of H-reflex responses. The reflex response declined with increasing rate of stimulation, the decline being slightly greater in soleus than in FCR. When these phenomena were examined with voluntary facilitation of the spinal cord, the time of recovery shortened and the effect of stimulus rate also diminished. Changes with background facilitation were greater in FCR than in soleus. The differences between the two muscles are attributed mainly to differences in presynaptic inhibition in the two spinal segments, and/or to the differences in dynamics of the transmitter release in terminals of Ia afferents synapsing with slow soleus motoneurons and those synapsing with the fast FCR motoneurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10333012     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  11 in total

1.  The influence of perturbation duration and velocity on the long-latency response to stretch in the biceps muscle.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Eric J Perreault; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spinal use-dependent plasticity of synaptic transmission in humans after a single cycling session.

Authors:  Sabine Meunier; Jeongyi Kwon; Heike Russmann; Shashi Ravindran; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Leonardo Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Group III/IV locomotor muscle afferents alter motor cortical and corticospinal excitability and promote central fatigue during cycling exercise.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu; Joshua C Weavil; Tyler S Mangum; Jacob E Jessop; Russell S Richardson; David E Morgan; Markus Amann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Estimating the time course of population excitatory postsynaptic potentials in motoneurons of spastic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Nina L Suresh; William Z Rymer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Prolonged time course of population excitatory postsynaptic potentials in motoneurons of chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Jongsang Son; Xiaogang Hu; Nina L Suresh; William Z Rymer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Post-activation depression in various group I spinal pathways in humans.

Authors:  J C Lamy; I Wargon; M Baret; D Ben Smail; P Milani; S Raoul; A Pénicaud; R Katz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effect of age on post-activation depression of the upper limb H-reflex.

Authors:  Carlo Trompetto; Lucio Marinelli; Laura Mori; Stefania Canneva; Federica Colombano; Elisabetta Traverso; Antonio Currà; Giovanni Abbruzzese
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Interaction of paired cortical and peripheral nerve stimulation on human motor neurons.

Authors:  David E Poon; Francois D Roy; Monica A Gorassini; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Acute corticospinal and spinal modulation after whole body vibration.

Authors:  A Krause; A Gollhofer; K Freyler; L Jablonka; R Ritzmann
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.041

10.  Indirect Vibration of the Upper Limbs Alters Transmission Along Spinal but Not Corticospinal Pathways.

Authors:  Trevor S Barss; David F Collins; Dylan Miller; Amit N Pujari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.