Literature DB >> 10332821

Propofol anesthesia.

C E Short1, A Bufalari.   

Abstract

Although questions may still remain regarding the use of this unique sedative-hypnotic drug with anesthetic properties in high-risk patients, our studies have provided cardiopulmonary and neurological evidence of the efficacy and safety of propofol when used as an anesthetic under normal and selected impaired conditions in the dog. 1. Propofol can be safely and effectively used for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in normal healthy dogs. Propofol is also a reliable and safe anesthetic agent when used during induced cardiovascular and pulmonary-impaired conditions without surgery. The propofol requirements to induce the safe and prompt induction of anesthesia prior to inhalant anesthesia with and without surgery have been determined. 2. The favorable recovery profile associated with propofol offers advantages over traditional anesthetics in clinical situations in which rapid recovery is important. Also, propofol compatibility with a large variety of preanesthetics may increase its use as a safe and reliable i.v. anesthetic for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia and sedation in small animal veterinary practice. Although propofol has proven to be a valuable adjuvant during short ambulatory procedures, its use for the maintenance of general anesthesia has been questioned for surgery lasting more than 1 hour because of increased cost and marginal differences in recovery times compared with those of standard inhalant or balanced anesthetic techniques. When propofol is used for the maintenance of anesthesia in combination with a sedative/analgesic, the quality of anesthesia is improved as well as the ease with which the practitioner can titrate propofol; therefore, practitioners are able to use i.v. anesthetic techniques more effectively in their clinical practices. 3. Propofol can induce significant depression of respiratory function, characterized by a reduction in the rate of respiration. Potent alpha 2 sedative/analgesics (e.g., xylazine, medetomidine) or opioids (e.g., oxymorphone, butorphanol) increase the probability of respiratory depression during anesthesia. Appropriate consideration of dose reduction and speed of administration of propofol reduces the degree of depression. Cardiovascular changes induced by propofol administration consist of a slight decrease in arterial blood pressures (systolic, mean, diastolic) without a compensatory increase in heart rate. Selective premedicants markedly modify this characteristic response. 4. When coupled with subjective responses to painful stimuli, EEG responses during propofol anesthesia provide clear evidence that satisfactory anesthesia has been achieved in experimental dogs. When propofol is used as the only anesthetic agent, a higher dose is required to induce an equipotent level of CNS depression compared with the situation when dogs are premedicated. 5. The propofol induction dose requirement should be appropriately decreased by 20% to 80% when propofol is administered in combination with sedative or analgesic agents as part of a balanced technique as well as in elderly and debilitated patients. As a general recommendation, the dose of propofol should always be carefully titrated against the needs and responses of the individual patient, as there is considerable variability in anesthetic requirements among patients. Because propofol does not have marked analgesic effects and its metabolism is rapid, the use of local anesthetics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and opioids to provide postoperative analgesia improves the quality of recovery after propofol anesthesia. 6. The cardiovascular depressant effects of propofol are well tolerated in healthy animals, but these effects may be more problematic in high-risk patients with intrinsic cardiac disease as well as in those with systemic disease. In hypovolemic patients and those with limited cardiac reserve, even small induction doses of propofol (0.75-1.5 mg/kg i.v.) can produce profound hypotens

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10332821     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-5616(99)50059-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract        ISSN: 0195-5616            Impact factor:   2.093


  10 in total

1.  Influence of lidocaine and diazepam on peri-induction intraocular pressures in dogs anesthetized with propofol-atracurium.

Authors:  Erik H Hofmeister; Clara O Williams; Christina Braun; Phillip Anthony Moore
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Ambulatory laparoscopic tubal ligation: a comparison of general anaesthesia with local anaesthesia and sedation.

Authors:  Lokesh Gupta; Sk Sinha; Maitree Pande; Homay Vajifdar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01

3.  Anaesthetic management for balloon dilation of cor triatriatum dexter in a dog.

Authors:  Valentina De Monte; Francesco Staffieri; Domenico Caivano; Antonello Bufalari
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Multicenter clinical evaluation of a multi-dose formulation of propofol in the dog.

Authors:  Khursheed R Mama; James S Gaynor; Ralph C Harvey; Sheilah A Robertson; Robbin L Koenig; Elizabeth M Cozzi
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Comparative experimental study on two designed intravenous anaesthetic combinations in dogs.

Authors:  Abdelnaser Abdelmoneim Azab Abdel-Hady; Khaled M Abdelbasset; Ahmed S Soliman
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.068

6.  More effective induction of anesthesia using midazolam-butorphanol-ketamine-sevoflurane compared with ketamine-sevoflurane in the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Hidetoshi Ishibashi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Evaluation of efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate - xylazine - propofol anesthesia in buffalo calves.

Authors:  Sandeep Potliya; Ashok Kumar; Sandeep Kumar; Sukhbir Singh; Sarvan Kumar
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2015-03-04

8.  Clinico-anesthetic changes following administration of propofol alone and in combination of meperidine and pentazocine lactate in dogs.

Authors:  A K Anandmay; L L Dass; A K Sharma; M K Gupta; K K Singh; B K Roy
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-11-02

9.  Central depressant effects and toxicity of propofol in chicks.

Authors:  A S Naser; F K Mohammad
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2014-08-13

10.  Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil vs propofol-remifentanil for monitored anesthesia care during hysteroscopy: Randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Seongjoo Park; Soo-Lyoen Choi; Francis Sahngun Nahm; Jung-Hee Ryu; Sang-Hwan Do
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.