Literature DB >> 10332514

Alternative approaches for measuring duration of work disability after low back injury based on administrative workers' compensation data.

N Krause1, L K Dasinger, L J Deegan, R J Brand, L Rudolph.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of low back pain (LBP) disability remain largely incomparable because of different outcome definitions. To date, systematic comparisons of alternative outcome measures have not been made.
METHODS: Duration of work disability was studied in a 3-year cohort of 850 workers' compensation LBP claimants. Eleven administrative outcome measures were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion of claimants still on disability benefits during 3.5 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: The estimated mean duration of work disability was 75 days for the first temporary disability (TD) episode, 108 days for cumulative time on TD, and 337 for total compensated days, which includes all types of wage replacement benefits during vocational rehabilitation, temporary and permanent disability.
CONCLUSIONS: Commonly used administrative measures of lost workdays--time to first return to work and time on temporary disability--substantially underestimate the duration of work disability compared to measures based on all wage replacement benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10332514     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199906)35:6<604::aid-ajim8>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  24 in total

Review 1.  Methodological challenges in studying recurrence of low back pain.

Authors:  Radoslaw Wasiak; Glenn S Pransky; Barbara S Webster
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

2.  Predictors of sustained return to work after work-related injury or disease: insights from workers' compensation claims records.

Authors:  Janneke Berecki-Gisolf; Fiona J Clay; Alex Collie; Roderick J McClure
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

3.  [Outcome parameters for clinical studies: change of paradigm?].

Authors:  B P Hanson; B Kopjar
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: research issues and directions for future research.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Doug Gross; Izabela Z Schultz; Chris Main; Pierre Côté; Glenn Pransky; William Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

5.  Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Douglas Paul Gross; Michele Crites Battié
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

6.  Development and validation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation for use in claimants with low back disorders.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié; Alexander Asante
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-03

7.  Does functional capacity evaluation predict recovery in workers' compensation claimants with upper extremity disorders?

Authors:  D P Gross; M C Battié
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Including injured workers without compensated time loss in Cox regression models: analyzing time loss using all available data.

Authors:  Jeanne M Sears; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-07-18

9.  A cluster randomized clinical trial comparing functional capacity evaluation and functional interviewing as components of occupational rehabilitation programs.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Alexander K Asante; Maxi Miciak; Michele C Battié; Linda J Carroll; Ambrose Sun; Marti Mikalsky; Rene Huellstrung; Riikka Niemeläinen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-12

Review 10.  Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of work (dis)ability: a scoping review of published definitions.

Authors:  Valérie Lederer; Patrick Loisel; Michèle Rivard; François Champagne
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.