Literature DB >> 10332448

Patient characteristics associated with vasectomy reversal.

J M Potts1, F F Pasqualotto, D Nelson, A J Thomas, A Agarwal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: More than 30 million couples throughout the world are using vasectomy as a method of birth control. It is estimated that up to 6% of men who undergo voluntary sterilization will eventually request reversal, despite the high cost and relatively low success rate of the procedure. We identified characteristics that predict which vasectomy patients may request reversal. We also examined the cost and effectiveness of pre-vasectomy sperm cryopreservation followed by intrauterine insemination as an alternative method of achieving pregnancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed medical charts of 365 patients who underwent vasectomy and 290 who underwent vasectomy reversal between 1990 and 1997. Data were collected on patient age at the time of vasectomy, religion, occupation, wife employment status, number of marriages, number of children, reason for reversal, and number of years between vasectomy and reversal. Based on previously reported values, pregnancy rates and cost per successful pregnancy were estimated for vasectomy reversal surgery, and compared with a calculated cost per pregnancy for sperm cryopreservation and intrauterine insemination.
RESULTS: Patient factors significantly associated with increased vasectomy reversal included younger age at time of vasectomy (p < 0.001) and a wife who worked outside the home (p < 0.001). Vasectomy reversal occurred 12.5 times more often (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.6 to 20.7) in men who underwent vasectomy in their 20s than in men who were older. Men whose wives were not employed requested reversal 0.48 times as often (95% CI 0.33 to 0.71) as those whose wives worked. Men who were younger at vasectomy tended to wait longer before reversal (median 10 years) than other patients (p < 0.001). At 10 years our calculated pregnancy rates and cost per pregnancy were 44% and $12,727 for vasectomy reversal, and 41% and $9,512 for intrauterine insemination with banked sperm (3 attempts).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who requested vasectomy reversal most often chose voluntary sterilization at a younger age. We believe that younger men should be given better pre-vasectomy counseling. However, the success rate and cost-effectiveness of sperm cryopreservation before vasectomy, with subsequent intrauterine insemination, may make this nonsurgical alternative desirable for younger couples who choose vasectomy even when properly informed about reversal rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10332448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

1.  Robot-assisted vasovasostomy using a single layer anastomosis.

Authors:  Michael T Marshall; Alexander D Doudt; Jonathan H Berger; Brian K Auge; Matthew S Christman; Chong H Choe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-11-07

2.  CUA guideline: Vasectomy.

Authors:  Armand Zini; John Grantmyre; Peter Chan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  The evolution of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Ryan M Dickey; Alexander W Pastuszak; Tariq S Hakky; Aravind Chandrashekar; Ranjith Ramasamy; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Predictors of success after bilateral epididymovasostomy performed during vasectomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Jesse Ory; Sirpi Nackeeran; Udi Blankstein; Joshua T White; Ethan Grober; Sheldon H Marks; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Different intervals between vasectomy and sperm retrieval interfere in the reproductive capacity from vasectomized men.

Authors:  Edson Borges Júnior; Lia Mara Rossi-Ferragut; Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto; Claudia Chagas Rocha; Assumpto Iaconelli Júnior
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Advances in male contraception.

Authors:  Stephanie T Page; John K Amory; William J Bremner
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 19.871

7.  A retrospective review of factors associated with vasovasostomies in United States military members.

Authors:  J Masterson; E Avalos; M Santomauro; R Walters; C Marguet; J L'Esperance; D Crain
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2012-12-21

8.  Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal: An update.

Authors:  Ranjith Ramasamy; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

Review 9.  Predictive factors for sperm retrieval and sperm injection outcomes in obstructive azoospermia: do etiology, retrieval techniques and gamete source play a role?

Authors:  Ricardo Miyaoka; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Advances in surgical treatment of male infertility.

Authors:  Hyo Serk Lee; Ju Tae Seo
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 5.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.