Literature DB >> 10332373

Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom.

N H Wilson1, F J Burke, I A Mjör.   

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a study on reasons for the placement and replacement of direct restorations in general dental practice in the United Kingdom. Twenty-two selected practitioners recorded information pertaining to up to 250 consecutive direct restorations placed by themselves during a 6-week period. From data derived from 2,379 restorations, it was found that about 60% of restorative practice in the United Kingdom may be found to comprise the replacement of existing restorations. For restorations of amalgam and glass-ionomer cement, the principal reason for replacement was secondary caries. For restorations of resin composite, secondary caries and poor appearance accounted for equal proportions of failures. Apart from the need for more extensive surveys of the type reported, the data emphasize the need to monitor treatment trends in contemporary clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10332373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  22 in total

1.  Influence of biofilm formation on the optical properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.

Authors:  Hong-Keun Hyun; Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict?

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.

Authors:  D Khvostenko; T J Hilton; J L Ferracane; J C Mitchell; J J Kruzic
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Hydrophobic and antimicrobial dentin: A peptide-based 2-tier protective system for dental resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Dina G Moussa; Alex Fok; Conrado Aparicio
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided.

Authors:  Erinne B Lubisich; Thomas J Hilton; Jack L Ferracane; Hristina I Pashova; Bruce Burton
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Effects of mouth rinses on color stability of resin composites.

Authors:  Cigdem Celik; Bulem Yuzugullu; Selim Erkut; Kıvanc Yamanel
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-10

7.  Degree of conversion and color stability of the light curing resin with new photoinitiator systems.

Authors:  Dong-Hoon Shin; H Ralph Rawls
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Novel F-releasing composite with improved mechanical properties.

Authors:  L Ling; X Xu; G-Y Choi; D Billodeaux; G Guo; R M Diwan
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Determination of the optimal photoinitiator concentration in dental composites based on essential material properties.

Authors:  L Musanje; J L Ferracane; R L Sakaguchi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; Ulla Pallesen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.