Literature DB >> 10332129

Cardiovascular effects of intraosseous injections of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 3 percent mepivacaine.

K Replogle1, A Reader, R Nist, M Beck, J Weaver, W J Meyers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because a number of patients have reported an increase in heart rate with the intraosseous, or i.o., injection, it is important to evaluate changes in the cardiovascular system with this injection technique. The purpose of this study was to determine the cardiovascular effects of an i.o. injection of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 3 percent mepivacaine.
METHODS: With the use of a repeated-measures design, the authors randomly assigned 42 subjects to receive i.o. injections of 1.8 milliliters of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 1.8 mL of 3 percent mepivacaine in a double-blinded manner at two appointments. At each appointment the authors monitored electrocardiographic findings, cardiac rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure before, during and after administration of anesthetic solutions.
RESULTS: With the 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine solution, 28 (67 percent) of 42 subjects experienced an increase in heart rate that might be attributed to the effect of the epinephrine. In 22 (79 percent) of these subjects, the heart rate returned to within 5 beats of baseline values within four minutes after solution deposition. The authors found no significant increase in heart rate in subjects receiving the 3 percent mepivacaine. No significant differences (P > .05) were found in mean diastolic, mean systolic or mean arterial blood pressure values between the subjects receiving 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and those receiving 3 percent mepivacaine.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of subjects receiving the i.o. injection of the 2 percent lidocaine-epinephrine solution experienced a transient increase in heart rate. No significant increase in heart rate was seen with the i.o. injection of 3 percent mepivacaine. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: While patients would likely notice the heart rate increase with the lidocaine-epinephrine solution, it would not be clinically significant in most healthy patients. In patients whose medical condition, drug therapies or epinephrine sensitivity suggests caution, 3 percent mepivacaine is a good alternative for i.o. injections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10332129     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  8 in total

1.  Heart rate effects of intraosseous injections using slow and fast rates of anesthetic solution deposition.

Authors:  Louis Susi; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver; Melissa Drum
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2008

2.  Efficacy and safety of intraseptal and periodontal ligament anesthesia achieved by computer-controlled articaine + epinephrine delivery: a dose-finding study.

Authors:  Vladimir Biocanin; Bozidar Brkovic; Biljana Milicic; Dragica Stojic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Intraosseous anaesthesia in children with 4 % articaine and epinephrine 1:400,000 using computer-assisted systems.

Authors:  J-L Sixou; A Marie-Cousin
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-08-08

4.  Side effects and complications of intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia.

Authors:  David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Javier Ata-Ali; María-José Oltra-Moscardó; María Peñarrocha-Diago; Miguel Peñarrocha
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-05-01

5.  Intraosseous anesthesia in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: Impact of bone thickness on perception and duration of pain.

Authors:  Manfred Nilius; Charlotte Mueller; Minou Helene Nilius; Dominik Haim; Henry Leonhardt; Guenter Lauer
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-12-28

Review 6.  Efficacy and safety of mepivacaine compared with lidocaine in local anaesthesia in dentistry: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Naichuan Su; Yan Liu; Xianrui Yang; Zongdao Shi; Yi Huang
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 7.  Role of intraseptal anesthesia for pain-free dental treatment.

Authors:  G Gazal; W M Fareed; M S Zafar
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

8.  Efficacy of Intraosseous Local Anesthesia for Restorative Procedures in Molar Incisor Hypomineralization-Affected Teeth in Children.

Authors:  Uma B Dixit; Amil V Joshi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.