Literature DB >> 10331881

Effects of erythropoietin administration in training athletes and possible indirect detection in doping control.

M Audran1, R Gareau, S Matecki, F Durand, C Chenard, M T Sicart, B Marion, F Bressolle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effects of repeated subcutaneous injection of rHuEpo (50 IU x kg(-1)) in athletes and proposes a method based on the measurement in blood samples of the sTfR/serum protein ratio to determine if the observed values of this marker are related to rHuEpo abuse.
METHODS: Serum erythropoietin concentrations, and hematological and biochemical parameters were evaluated, during treatment and for 25 d posttreatment in nine training athletes. Moreover, the effect of rHuEpo administrations on the maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) and ventilatory threshold (VT) of these athletes was also studied. Threshold values for sTfr and the sTfr/serum protein ratio were determined from 233 subjects (185 athletes, 15 athletes training at moderately high altitude, and 33 subjects living at >3000 m).
RESULTS: Significant changes in reticulocytes, hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, hematocrit (Hct), sTfr, and sTfr/serum proteins were observed during and after rHuEpo treatment. The maximal heart rate of 177 beats x min(-1) at the beginning of the study was significantly higher than the value of 168 beats x min(-1) after 26 d of rHuEpo administration. Compared with the values measured at baseline, the VT measured after rHuEpo administration occurred at a statistically significant high level of oxygen uptake.
CONCLUSIONS: When oxygen uptake measured at the VT was expressed as a percentage of V02 max, the values obtained were also significantly higher. The increased values of Tfr and sTfr/serum proteins, respectively, above 10 microg x mL(-1) and 153, indicated the probable intake of rHuEpo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10331881     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199905000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  21 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of professional road cycling.

Authors:  A Lucia; J Hoyos; J L Chicharro
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of recombinant human erythropoietins in doping control.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Varlet-Marie; Aurélie Gaudard; Michel Audran; Francoise Bressolle
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The use of the terms 'lifestyle medicines' or 'lifestyle drugs'.

Authors:  Claus Møldrup
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2004-08

4.  Prolonged administration of recombinant human erythropoietin increases submaximal performance more than maximal aerobic capacity.

Authors:  J J Thomsen; R L Rentsch; P Robach; J A L Calbet; R Boushel; P Rasmussen; C Juel; C Lundby
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Reticulocytes in sports medicine.

Authors:  Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Popular sports supplements and ergogenic aids.

Authors:  Mark Juhn
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of recombinant human erythropoietin in athletes : a population approach.

Authors:  A Gaudard; E Varlet-Marie; M Audran; R Gomeni; F Bressolle
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 8.  Maximal oxygen consumption in healthy humans: theories and facts.

Authors:  Guido Ferretti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Faster oxygen uptake kinetics at the onset of submaximal cycling exercise following 4 weeks recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) treatment.

Authors:  Philippe Connes; Stéphane Perrey; Alain Varray; Christian Préfaut; Corinne Caillaud
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 10.  Erythropoietin doping in cycling: lack of evidence for efficacy and a negative risk-benefit.

Authors:  Jules A A C Heuberger; Joost M Cohen Tervaert; Femke M L Schepers; Adriaan D B Vliegenthart; Joris I Rotmans; Johannes M A Daniels; Jacobus Burggraaf; Adam F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.