Literature DB >> 10330937

Are the motility abnormalities of achalasia reversible? An experimental outflow obstruction in the feline model.

J H Schneider1, J H Peters, E Kirkman, C G Bremner, T R DeMeester.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that the loss of esophageal body function in achalasia may be a result of the outflow obstruction of a nonrelaxing, hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter. The reversibility of such abnormalities has implications to the timing of therapeutic interventions. This study was designed to evaluate the evolution and reversibility of motility abnormalities resulting from esophageal outflow obstruction in cats.
METHODS: Twenty adult cats were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 4 cats that underwent laparotomy as a sham procedure. Group 2 consisted of 16 cats that underwent surgical placement of a loose Gore-tex expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (W. L. Gore, Elkton, Md) band calibrated to 110% of the circumference of the gastroesophageal junction. The band was removed from 4 randomly selected cats each at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after placement. Esophageal manometry was performed before placement of the band, at weekly intervals after placement of the band, and after removal of the band. The resting pressure and percent relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), in addition to amplitude, duration, and propagation of esophageal body contractions, were measured at each interval. Data are expressed as median and interquartile range and compared with use of the Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples.
RESULTS: The LES resting pressure remained unchanged after placement of the band, but sphincter compliance was reduced, as manifested by a significant reduction in the percent of sphincter relaxation (98% prebanding, 65% postbanding, P < .05). The median amplitude of esophageal contraction decreased significantly after banding. By 6 weeks after banding the esophagus was markedly dilated and exhibited aperistaltic, low-amplitude esophageal motility typical of that seen in clinical achalasia. Importantly, removal of the bands resulted in a prompt return of both peristalsis and amplitude of contraction.
CONCLUSIONS: Loss of compliance of the lower esophageal sphincter produces outflow obstruction with the resultant loss of esophageal contraction amplitude and peristaltic waveform typical of achalasia in humans. These abnormalities were reversible after relief of obstruction in the feline model and may indicate that early relief of outflow obstruction in clinical achalasia may preserve esophageal function in patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10330937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  15 in total

1.  The Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Detects Esophageal Contractility Not Observed With Manometry in Patients With Achalasia.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Zhiyue Lin; Peter J Kahrilas; Joel Sternbach; Erica N Donnan; Laurel Friesen; Zoe Listernick; Benjamin Mogni; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Significance of limited hiatal dissection in surgery for achalasia.

Authors:  Aleksandar Petar Simić; Nebojsa S Radovanović; Ognjan M Skrobić; Zoran J Raznatović; Predrag M Pesko
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Albert J Bredenoord; Mark Fox; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; André J P M Smout; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Megaesophagus in a line of transgenic rats: a model of achalasia.

Authors:  J Pang; T M Borjeson; S Muthupalani; R M Ducore; C A Carr; Y Feng; M P Sullivan; V Cristofaro; J Luo; J M Lindstrom; J G Fox
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.221

5.  Esophageal achalasia and secondary megaesophagus in a dog.

Authors:  Pedro A Boria; Cynthia R L Webster; John Berg
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  A model for gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity: the effect of chronic partial gastric outlet obstruction on esophageal physiology.

Authors:  Robert W O'Rourke; Ann K Seltman; Eugene Y Chang; Kevin M Reavis; Brian S Diggs; John G Hunter; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Timing of surgical intervention does not influence return of esophageal peristalsis or outcome for patients with achalasia.

Authors:  M G Patti; C Galvani; M V Gorodner; P Tedesco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve restores motility in an animal model of achalasia.

Authors:  Yashodhan S Khajanchee; Roger VanAndel; Blair A Jobe; Michael J Barra; Paul D Hansen; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Partial recovery of peristalsis after myotomy for achalasia: more the rule than the exception.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Peter J Kahrilas; François Mion; Thomas B Nealis; Nathaniel J Soper; Gilles Poncet; Frédéric Nicodème; Eric Hungness; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Nonsurgical management of luminal dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Geraldine Ooi; Paul Burton; Cheryl Laurie; Geoff Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien; Wendy A Brown
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.