Literature DB >> 10330682

Biological regulation of receptor-hormone complex concentrations in relation to dose-response assessments for endocrine-active compounds.

M E Andersen1, H A Barton.   

Abstract

Some endocrine-active compounds (EACs) act as agonists or antagonists of specific hormones and may interfere with cellular control processes that regulate gene transcription. Many mechanisms controlling gene expression are universal to organisms ranging from unicellular bacteria to more complex plants and animals. One mechanism, coordinated control of batteries of gene products, is critical in adaptation of bacteria to new environments and for development and tissue differentiation in multi-cellular organisms. To coordinately activate sets of genes, all living organisms have devised molecular modules to permit transitions, or switching, between different functional states over a small range of hormone concentration, and other modules to stabilize the new state through homeostatic interactions. Both switching and homeostasis are regulated by controlling concentrations of hormone-receptor complexes. Molecular control processes for switching and homeostasis are inherently nonlinear and often utilize autoregulatory feedback loops. Among the biological processes contributing to switching phenomena are receptor autoinduction, induction of enzymes for ligand synthesis, mRNA stabilization/activation, and receptor polymerization. This paper discusses a variety of molecular switches found in animal species, devises simple quantitative models illustrating roles of specific molecular interactions in creating switching modules, and outlines the impact of these switching processes and other feedback loops for risk assessments with EACs. Quantitative simulation modeling of these switching mechanisms made it apparent that highly nonlinear dose-response curves for hormones and EACs readily arise from interactions of several linear processes acting in concert on a common control point. These nonlinear mechanisms involve amplification of response, rather than multimeric molecular interactions as in conventional Hill relationships.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10330682     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/48.1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of skewed exposure in case-control studies with pooling.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Neil J Perkins; Zhiwei Zhang; Aijun Ye; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of combined medication of two different antimuscarinics for treatment of adults with idiopathic overactive bladder in whom a single agent antimuscarinic therapy failed.

Authors:  Junseok Yi; Seong Jin Jeong; Min Soo Chung; Hongzoo Park; Sang Wook Lee; Seung Hwan Doo; Cheol Yong Yoon; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Molecular circuits, biological switches, and nonlinear dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Melvin E Andersen; Raymond S H Yang; C Tenley French; Laura S Chubb; James E Dennison
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Quantitative mechanistically based dose-response modeling with endocrine-active compounds.

Authors:  M E Andersen; R B Conolly; E M Faustman; R J Kavlock; C J Portier; D M Sheehan; P J Wier; L Ziese
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  How subchronic and chronic health effects can be neglected for GMOs, pesticides or chemicals.

Authors:  Gilles-Eric Séralini; Joël Spiroux de Vendômois; Dominique Cellier; Charles Sultan; Marcello Buiatti; Lou Gallagher; Michael Antoniou; Krishna R Dronamraju
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.580

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.