Literature DB >> 10328859

Physical imagery: kinematic versus dynamic models.

D L Schwartz1.   

Abstract

Physical imagery occurs when people imagine one object causing a change to a second object. To make inferences through physical imagery, people must represent information that coordinates the interactions among the imagined objects. The current research contrasts two proposals for how this coordinating information is realized in physical imagery. In the traditional kinematic formulation, imagery transformations are coordinated by geometric information in analog spatial representations. In the dynamic formulation, transformations may also be regulated by analog representations of force and resistance. Four experiments support the dynamic formulation. They show, for example, that without making changes to the spatial properties of a problem, dynamic perceptual information (e.g., torque) and beliefs about physical properties (e. g., viscosity) affect the inferences that people draw through imagery. The studies suggest that physical imagery is not so much an analog of visual perception as it is an analog of physical action. A simple model that represents force as a rate helps explain why inferences can emerge through imagined actions even though people may not know the answer explicitly. It also explains how and when perception, beliefs, and learning can influence physical imagery. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10328859     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  The impetus theory in judgments about object motion: a new perspective.

Authors:  Peter A White
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

2.  AI, visual imagery, and a case study on the challenges posed by human intelligence tests.

Authors:  Maithilee Kunda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fictive motion as cognitive simulation.

Authors:  Teenie Matlock
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

4.  Are things that are hard to physically move also hard to imagine moving?

Authors:  Stephen J Flusberg; Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

5.  When writing impairs reading: letter perception's susceptibility to motor interference.

Authors:  Karin H James; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-08

6.  A geometric model of defensive peripersonal space.

Authors:  R J Bufacchi; M Liang; L D Griffin; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spontaneous body movements in spatial cognition.

Authors:  Sergiu Tcaci Popescu; Mark Wexler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.