Literature DB >> 10328793

Forced copulation results in few extrapair fertilizations in Ross's and lesser snow geese.

.   

Abstract

Extrapair paternity varies from 0 to over 70% of young among various populations of birds. Comparative studies have suggested that this variation is related to nesting density, breeding synchrony and the proportion of extrapair copulations. We used minisatellite DNA fingerprinting to examine levels of extrapair paternity in Ross's geese, Chen rossi, and lesser snow geese, C. caerulescens c. (hereafter snow geese) nesting in the largest known goose colony in the world. These geese have one of the highest known percentages of extrapair copulation (46-56% of all attempted copulations), and all of these appeared to be forced. Among all successful copulations, 33 and 38% were extrapair in Ross's and snow geese, respectively. Despite the high percentage of extrapair copulations, extrapair paternity was low in both Ross's and snow geese (2-5% of young). Extrapair paternity was not related to nest density in either species. However, in snow geese, extrapair paternity was more likely to occur in nests of females that nested asynchronously, either early or late in the season. This is one of a few reported examples of a negative relationship between extrapair paternity and breeding synchrony. Extrapair young also tended to come from eggs laid later in the clutch. Although forced extrapair copulations appear to be a relatively inefficient reproductive tactic for males, they may provide a reproductive advantage for some males. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10328793     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  10 in total

Review 1.  The limits of sexual conflict in the narrow sense: new insights from waterfowl biology.

Authors:  Patricia L R Brennan; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Temporal dynamics of competitive fertilization in social groups of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) shed new light on avian sperm competition.

Authors:  Rômulo Carleial; Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; Yunke Wang; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Mating system drives negative associations between morphological features in Schistosomatidae.

Authors:  Sophie Beltran; Yves Desdevises; Julien Portela; Jérôme Boissier
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Experimentally simulating paternity uncertainty: immediate and long-term responses of male and female reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus.

Authors:  Herbert Hoi; Ján Krištofík; Alžbeta Darolová
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spatial patterns of extra-pair paternity in a waterbird colony: separating the effects of nesting density and nest site location.

Authors:  Piotr Minias; Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas; Robert Rutkowski; Krzysztof Kaczmarek; Tomasz Janiszewski
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  How do colonial Eurasian Griffon Vultures prevent extra-pair mating?

Authors:  Joan Bertran; Francesc Xavier Macià; Antoni Margalida
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Nest parasitism, promiscuity, and relatedness among wood ducks.

Authors:  Kayla Harvey; Philip Lavretsky; Justyn Foth; Christopher K Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interspecific forced copulations generate most hybrids in broadly sympatric ducks.

Authors:  Sievert Rohwer; Christopher S Wood; Jefferey L Peters; Eliot Trimarchi Miller; David Cagley; Bronwyn G Butcher; Kevin L Epperly; Leonardo Campagna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl.

Authors:  Patricia L R Brennan; Richard O Prum; Kevin G McCracken; Michael D Sorenson; Robert E Wilson; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Hybridization in geese: a review.

Authors:  Jente Ottenburghs; Pim van Hooft; Sipke E van Wieren; Ronald C Ydenberg; Herbert H T Prins
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.