OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical presentation, outcome, and possible underlying mechanism of aqueous misdirection after glaucoma drainage device implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Ten eyes (five primary open-angle glaucoma, four chronic angle-closure glaucoma, one nanophthalmos) of nine patients with a mean age of 68.5+/-12.0 years (range, 43-83 years). INTERVENTION: The authors reviewed the medical records of all patients with a clinical diagnosis of aqueous misdirection after Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device implantation at two tertiary care referral centers from October 1992 to October 1997. Surgery was performed in a standardized fashion; all drainage tubes were inserted in the anterior chamber and occluded with an external 7-0 polyglactin ligature. All eyes were treated with topical corticosteroids, cycloplegia, and aqueous suppressants. Eyes with persistent aqueous misdirection received neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) hyaloidotomy or pars plana vitrectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, biomicroscopic anterior chamber depth, and antiglaucomatous medication. RESULTS: All eyes had axial shallowing of the anterior chamber, one or more patent iridotomies, and no ophthalmoscopic or B-scan ultrasonographic evidence of serous or hemorrhagic ciliochoroidal detachment. Median time to the development of angle-closure glaucoma was 33.5 days (range, 1-343 days) and mean intraocular pressure at diagnosis was 27.7+/-18.7 mm Hg (range, 10-62 mm Hg). Normalization of anterior segment anatomy was achieved with aqueous suppression and cycloplegia (one eye); Nd:YAG capsulotomy (four eyes); pars plana vitrectomy alone (two eyes) or with lensectomy (one eye), and pars plana vitrectomy with intraocular lens explanation (two eyes). Mean final intraocular pressure was 14.1+/-6.0 mmHg at a mean follow-up of 9.1+/-7.8 months after the development of aqueous misdirection (range, 1-23 months). CONCLUSIONS: Aqueous misdirection may develop days to months after glaucoma drainage device implantation. In this series, there was a poor response to medical therapy, and normalization in anterior chamber depth required aggressive laser and surgical therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical presentation, outcome, and possible underlying mechanism of aqueous misdirection after glaucoma drainage device implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Ten eyes (five primary open-angle glaucoma, four chronic angle-closure glaucoma, one nanophthalmos) of nine patients with a mean age of 68.5+/-12.0 years (range, 43-83 years). INTERVENTION: The authors reviewed the medical records of all patients with a clinical diagnosis of aqueous misdirection after Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device implantation at two tertiary care referral centers from October 1992 to October 1997. Surgery was performed in a standardized fashion; all drainage tubes were inserted in the anterior chamber and occluded with an external 7-0 polyglactin ligature. All eyes were treated with topical corticosteroids, cycloplegia, and aqueous suppressants. Eyes with persistent aqueous misdirection received neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) hyaloidotomy or pars plana vitrectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, biomicroscopic anterior chamber depth, and antiglaucomatous medication. RESULTS: All eyes had axial shallowing of the anterior chamber, one or more patent iridotomies, and no ophthalmoscopic or B-scan ultrasonographic evidence of serous or hemorrhagic ciliochoroidal detachment. Median time to the development of angle-closure glaucoma was 33.5 days (range, 1-343 days) and mean intraocular pressure at diagnosis was 27.7+/-18.7 mm Hg (range, 10-62 mm Hg). Normalization of anterior segment anatomy was achieved with aqueous suppression and cycloplegia (one eye); Nd:YAG capsulotomy (four eyes); pars plana vitrectomy alone (two eyes) or with lensectomy (one eye), and pars plana vitrectomy with intraocular lens explanation (two eyes). Mean final intraocular pressure was 14.1+/-6.0 mmHg at a mean follow-up of 9.1+/-7.8 months after the development of aqueous misdirection (range, 1-23 months). CONCLUSIONS: Aqueous misdirection may develop days to months after glaucoma drainage device implantation. In this series, there was a poor response to medical therapy, and normalization in anterior chamber depth required aggressive laser and surgical therapy.
Authors: Eamon Sharkawi; Paul H Artes; Daniel Josef Lindegger; Maria Laura Dari; Mohamad El Wardani; Jérôme Pasquier; Adriano Guarnieri Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Brian J Song; Meera Ramanathan; Esteban Morales; Simon K Law; JoAnn A Giaconi; Anne L Coleman; Joseph Caprioli Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.503