G V Stimson1, S Jones, C Chalmers, D Sullivan. 1. Department of Social Science and Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, University of London, UK.
Abstract
AIM: To develop a short injecting risk questionnaire (IRQ) to measure sharing of injecting equipment. DESIGN: Matrix design with quota assignment, designed to compare the questionnaire when used by interview and self-completion, in agency and community settings, by agency staff and fieldworkers, with different injectors (age < 26 vs. 26+; male vs. female, opiate vs stimulant injectors), and in different geographical areas. SETTINGS: Drug treatment and helping agencies, and community settings, in England. PARTICIPANTS: Drug users who had injected in the last 4 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Questions measured different aspects of equipment sharing. Questionnaire performance assessed by question acceptability, test-retest (parallel forms) reliability, inter-rater reliability, inter-instrument reliability, internal reliability, construct validity and internal collateral validity. Statistical tests included product moment correlation, principal components analysis, and Cronbach's alpha. FINDINGS: The questionnaire was highly acceptable. Test-retest correlations were all high and significant, questions performed well in all conditions, with no differences by site (agency vs. out-of-contact), order (interview or self-completion first), administration (staff vs. fieldworker), elapsed time or subject characteristics. The questionnaire had high internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha > +0.86), and items measured a similar domain with all questions loading highly (> 0.32) on a single factor which accounted for > 42% of the variance. The complete IRQ elicited higher reports of equipment sharing (77%) than a single question (56%). CONCLUSIONS: IRQ performs well in a variety of settings, when administered in different ways to different kinds of IDUs. A single question on 'sharing' elicits fewer positive responses than the use of multiple questions about different sharing practices.
AIM: To develop a short injecting risk questionnaire (IRQ) to measure sharing of injecting equipment. DESIGN: Matrix design with quota assignment, designed to compare the questionnaire when used by interview and self-completion, in agency and community settings, by agency staff and fieldworkers, with different injectors (age < 26 vs. 26+; male vs. female, opiate vs stimulant injectors), and in different geographical areas. SETTINGS: Drug treatment and helping agencies, and community settings, in England. PARTICIPANTS: Drug users who had injected in the last 4 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Questions measured different aspects of equipment sharing. Questionnaire performance assessed by question acceptability, test-retest (parallel forms) reliability, inter-rater reliability, inter-instrument reliability, internal reliability, construct validity and internal collateral validity. Statistical tests included product moment correlation, principal components analysis, and Cronbach's alpha. FINDINGS: The questionnaire was highly acceptable. Test-retest correlations were all high and significant, questions performed well in all conditions, with no differences by site (agency vs. out-of-contact), order (interview or self-completion first), administration (staff vs. fieldworker), elapsed time or subject characteristics. The questionnaire had high internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha > +0.86), and items measured a similar domain with all questions loading highly (> 0.32) on a single factor which accounted for > 42% of the variance. The complete IRQ elicited higher reports of equipment sharing (77%) than a single question (56%). CONCLUSIONS: IRQ performs well in a variety of settings, when administered in different ways to different kinds of IDUs. A single question on 'sharing' elicits fewer positive responses than the use of multiple questions about different sharing practices.
Authors: V D Hope; A Judd; M Hickman; T Lamagni; G Hunter; G V Stimson; S Jones; L Donovan; J V Parry; O N Gill Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lucy Platt; Tim Rhodes; Ali Judd; Evgeniya Koshkina; Svetlana Maksimova; Natalia Latishevskaya; Adrian Renton; Tamara McDonald; John V Parry Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-10-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mohammed Abou-Saleh; Paul Davis; Philip Rice; Ken Checinski; Colin Drummond; Douglas Maxwell; Christine Godfrey; Christopher John; Betsy Corrin; Christopher Tibbs; Adenekan Oyefeso; Marian de Ruiter; Hamid Ghodse Journal: Harm Reduct J Date: 2008-07-31
Authors: Lucy Platt; Martin Wall; Tim Rhodes; Ali Judd; Matthew Hickman; Lisa G Johnston; Adrian Renton; Natalia Bobrova; Anya Sarang Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.671