Literature DB >> 10327824

HEDIS measures and managed care enrollment.

D P Scanlon1, M Chernew.   

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between 1996 health plan enrollment and both HEDIS-based plan performance ratings and individual HEDIS measures. Data were obtained from a large firm that collected, aggregated, and disseminated plan performance ratings to its employees. Plan market share regressions are estimated controlling for out-of-pocket price and model type in addition to the plan ratings and HEDIS measures. The results suggests that employees did not respond strongly to the provided ratings. There are several potential explanations for the lack of response, including difficulty understanding the ratings and never having seen them. In addition, employees may base their plan choices on information that is obtained from their own past experience, friends, family, and colleagues. The pattern of results suggests that such information is important. Counterintuitive signs most likely reflect an inverse correlation between some HEDIS ratings (or measures) and attributes employees observe informally.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10327824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  11 in total

1.  Consumer preferences: path to improvement?

Authors:  C M Clancy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The role of performance measures for improving quality in managed care organizations.

Authors:  D P Scanlon; C Darby; E Rolph; H E Doty
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Health plan decision making with new medicare information materials.

Authors:  L A McCormack; S A Garfinkel; J H Hibbard; E C Norton; U J Bayen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public.

Authors:  E C Schneider; T Lieberman
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-06

5.  Can high quality overcome consumer resistance to restricted provider access? Evidence from a health plan choice experiment.

Authors:  Katherine M Harris
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The well-being 5: development and validation of a diagnostic instrument to improve population well-being.

Authors:  Lindsay E Sears; Sangeeta Agrawal; James A Sidney; Patricia H Castle; Elizabeth Y Rula; Carter R Coberley; Dan Witters; James E Pope; James K Harter
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.459

7.  Strategies for reporting health plan performance information to consumers: evidence from controlled studies.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Paul Slovic; Ellen Peters; Melissa L Finucane
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Managed care quality of care and plan choice in New York SCHIP.

Authors:  Hangsheng Liu; Charles E Phelps; Peter J Veazie; Andrew W Dick; Jonathan D Klein; Laura P Shone; Katia Noyes; Peter G Szilagyi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  What influences the awareness of physician quality information? Implications for Medicare.

Authors:  Jon Christianson; Daniel Maeng; Jean Abraham; Dennis P Scanlon; Jeffrey Alexander; Jessica Mittler; Michael Finch
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-06-09

10.  Effect of part-time practice on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Patricia H Parkerton; Edward H Wagner; Dean G Smith; Hugh L Straley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.