Literature DB >> 10327423

Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization is modulated by environmental stimuli.

S Fraioli1, H S Crombag, A Badiani, T E Robinson.   

Abstract

We have previously reported that intravenous (i.v.) administrations of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg of amphetamine in the absence of any environmental stimuli predictive of drug administration failed to induce psychomotor sensitization whereas the same drug did produce robust sensitization when given in association with environmental novelty. These results were obtained by studying rotational behavior in animals with a unilateral 6-OHDA lesion of the mesostriatal dopamine system. The purpose of this study was to determine if environmental novelty has a similar effect on sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of amphetamine in neurologically intact rats. Rats were implanted with i.v. catheters and divided in four groups. Two groups were housed in locomotor activity cages and given seven consecutive i.v. infusions of either saline (SAL-HOME group) or 0.375 mg/kg of amphetamine (AMPH-HOME group), using a remotely activated delivery system. Simultaneously, the other two groups were transported to the test cages and given the same treatment (SAL-NOVEL and AMPH-NOVEL groups). After one week withdrawal, all groups were given an amphetamine challenge (0.375 mg/kg, i.v.). Amphetamine sensitization developed when the drug was administered under NOVEL conditions, as indicated by a progressive increase in amphetamine-induced locomotor activity over test sessions and by a greater response to the amphetamine challenge in the AMPH-pretreated versus the SAL-pretreated group. In contrast, no sensitization was observed under HOME conditions. Similar results were obtained with the analysis of vertical activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10327423     DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00079-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  9 in total

1.  Restraint stress attenuates nicotine's locomotor stimulant but not discriminative stimulus effects in rats.

Authors:  Andrew C Harris; Christina Mattson; David Shelley; Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  One-trial cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in preweanling rats: role of contextual stimuli.

Authors:  Matthew S Herbert; Taleen Der-Ghazarian; Alexandria G Palmer; Sanders A McDougall
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Transient disruption of attentional performance following escalating amphetamine administration in rats.

Authors:  Robyn L Kondrad; Joshua A Burk
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Individual differences in the conditioned and unconditioned rat 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations elicited by repeated amphetamine exposure.

Authors:  Allison M Ahrens; Cameron W Nobile; Lindsay E Page; Esther Y Maier; Christine L Duvauchelle; Timothy Schallert
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Repeated amphetamine administration outside the home cage enhances drug-induced Fos expression in rat nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Brandi J Mattson; Hans S Crombag; Tim Mitchell; Danielle E Simmons; Justin D Kreuter; Marisela Morales; Bruce T Hope
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Inbred Lewis and Fischer 344 rat strains differ not only in novelty- and amphetamine-induced behaviors, but also in dopamine transporter activity in vivo.

Authors:  Joshua M Gulley; Carson V Everett; Nancy R Zahniser
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Contribution of drug doses and conditioning periods to psychomotor stimulant sensitization.

Authors:  Mark S Todtenkopf; William A Carlezon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Environmental modulation of cocaine self-administration in the rat.

Authors:  Daniele Caprioli; Giovanna Paolone; Michele Celentano; Arianna Testa; Paolo Nencini; Aldo Badiani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 4.415

9.  Heroin versus cocaine: opposite choice as a function of context but not of drug history in the rat.

Authors:  Maria Teresa De Luca; Christian Montanari; Maria Meringolo; Laura Contu; Michele Celentano; Aldo Badiani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.530

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.