Literature DB >> 10327229

Cost-effectiveness of self-managed anticoagulant therapy in Germany.

U Taborski1, F J Wittstamm, A Bernardo.   

Abstract

In this study, the cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation self-management--which is now established in Germany--was compared with the conventional method of monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy by the patient's family physician or by a specialist. Costs were determined based on the usual conditions in Germany such as frequency of testing and control testing, scope of the tests, and diagnostic and therapeutic standards for thromboembolic or bleeding complications. In addition to direct monitoring costs, we determined the costs for treating minor and serious complications and used them to calculate overall therapy costs. The incidence of complications was estimated based on the results of more recent studies. The only costs considered in this study were those covered by the primary cost carrier--the government-controlled health insurance funds--and included outpatient visits and, in cases of serious complications, acute inpatient treatment and rehabilitation. It was shown that the costs to treat minor complications only slightly affected annual, overall treatment costs. The potential reduction in incidences of serious bleeding and thromboembolic complications due to anticoagulation self-management--which is independent of the indication for oral anticoagulation--reduced overall therapy costs from DM 2,061.48/patient-year for conventional therapeutic methods to DM 1,342.46/patient-year for patients under self-management of anticoagulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10327229     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-996432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost        ISSN: 0094-6176            Impact factor:   4.180


  16 in total

1.  Recommendations for patients undertaking self management of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  D A Fitzmaurice; S J Machin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-27

Review 2.  Anticoagulation in patients with thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  R C Tait
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Oral anticoagulation control: the European perspective.

Authors:  David A Fitzmaurice
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Anticoagulation: where we are and where we need to go.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Barnes; James B Froehlich
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  [Oral anticoagulation using coumarins - an update].

Authors:  Christoph Sucker; Jens Litmathe
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-06-12

6.  A randomised controlled trial of patient self management of oral anticoagulation treatment compared with primary care management.

Authors:  D A Fitzmaurice; E T Murray; K M Gee; T F Allan; F D R Hobbs
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Economic evaluation of the use of point-of-care devices in patients with long term oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Sophie Gerkens; Jeannine Gailly; Caroline Obyn; Stephan Devriese; Irina Cleemput
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Cost-effectiveness of self-managed versus physician-managed oral anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Dean A Regier; Rubina Sunderji; Larry D Lynd; Kenneth Gin; Carlo A Marra
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Patient time requirements for anticoagulation therapy with warfarin.

Authors:  Daniel E Jonas; Betsy Bryant Shilliday; W Russell Laundon; Michael Pignone
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 10.  The future of anticoagulation clinics.

Authors:  B Gail Macik
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2003 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.