Literature DB >> 10327087

Factors affecting minimum push and pull forces of manual carts.

K W Al-Eisawi1, C J Kerk, J J Congleton, A A Amendola, O C Jenkins, W Gaines.   

Abstract

The minimum forces needed to manually push or pull a 4-wheel cart of differing weights with similar wheel sizes from a stationary state were measured on four floor materials under different conditions of wheel width, diameter, and orientation. Cart load was increased from 0 to 181.4 kg in increments of 36.3 kg. The floor materials were smooth concrete, tile, asphalt, and industrial carpet. Two wheel widths were tested: 25 and 38 mm. Wheel diameters were 51, 102, and 153 mm. Wheel orientation was tested at four levels: F0R0 (all four wheels aligned in the forward direction), F0R90 (the two front wheels, the wheels furthest from the cart handle, aligned in the forward direction and the two rear wheels, the wheels closest to the cart handle, aligned at 90 degrees to the forward direction), F90R0 (the two front wheels aligned at 90 degrees to the forward direction and the two rear wheels aligned in the forward direction), and F90R90 (all four wheels aligned at 90 degrees to the forward direction). Wheel width did not have a significant effect on the minimum push/pull forces. The minimum push/pull forces were linearly proportional to cart weight, and inversely proportional to wheel diameter. The coefficients of rolling friction were estimated as 2.2, 2.4, 3.3, and 4.5 mm for hard rubber wheels rolling on smooth concrete, tile, asphalt, and industrial carpet floors, respectively. The effect of wheel orientation was not consistent over the tested conditions, but, in general, the smallest minimum push/pull forces were measured with all four wheels aligned in the forward direction, whereas the largest minimum push/pull forces were measured when all four wheels were aligned at 90 degrees to the forward direction. There was no significant difference between the push and pull forces when all four wheels were aligned in the forward direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10327087     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(98)00019-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  5 in total

1.  Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Thomas Waters; Jay Kapellusch; Waldemar Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.656

2.  The Effects of Direction of Exertion, Path, and Load Placement in Nursing Cart Pushing and Pulling Tasks: An Electromyographical Study.

Authors:  Huei Chu Kao; Chiuhsiang Joe Lin; Yung Hui Lee; Su Huang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Compliant flooring to prevent fall-related injuries in older adults: A scoping review of biomechanical efficacy, clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and workplace safety.

Authors:  Chantelle C Lachance; Michal P Jurkowski; Ania C Dymarz; Stephen N Robinovitch; Fabio Feldman; Andrew C Laing; Dawn C Mackey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Factors Affecting Material-Cart Handling in the Roofing Industry: Evidence for Administrative Controls.

Authors:  Zhenyu Zhang; Ken-Yu Lin; Jia-Hua Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Design and Development of an Ergonomic Trolley-Lifter for Sheet Metal Handling Task: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Radin Zaid Radin Umar; Nadiah Ahmad; Isa Halim; Poh Yan Lee; Malek Hamid
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2019-06-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.