Literature DB >> 10325697

Distinguishing between "no evidence of effect" and "evidence of no effect" in randomised controlled trials and other comparisons.

W O Tarnow-Mordi1, M J Healy.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10325697      PMCID： PMC1717858          DOI： 10.1136/adc.80.3.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN： 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-19

Review 2.  A review of randomised controlled trials published in Archives of Disease in Childhood from 1982-96.

Authors:  H Campbell; S A Surry; E M Royle
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Clinical trial reporting.

Authors:  R Peto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

Authors:  C Begg; M Cho; S Eastwood; R Horton; D Moher; I Olkin; R Pitkin; D Rennie; K F Schulz; D Simel; D F Stroup
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Randomised controlled trials in perinatal medicine: 1. The need for studies of mortality and major morbidity with adequate power.

Authors:  W Tarnow-Mordi; P Brocklehurst
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-07

6.  Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994.

Authors:  P A Crowley
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Randomised trials and the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Minimum requirements for publication.

Authors:  J M Grant
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1995-11

8.  Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods.

Authors:  B Jones; P Jarvis; J A Lewis; A F Ebbutt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06
  8 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Promising stratagems for reducing the burden of neonatal sepsis.

Authors:  N Modi; R Carr
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Risperidone versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katja Komossa; Christine Rummel-Kluge; Sandra Schwarz; Franziska Schmid; Heike Hunger; Werner Kissling; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-01-19

Review 3.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.

Authors:  Barbara Gomes; Natalia Calanzani; Vito Curiale; Paul McCrone; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-06

4.  Pitfalls in the design and analysis of paediatric clinical trials: a case of a 'failed' multi-centre study, and potential solutions.

Authors:  Johanna H van der Lee; Michael W T Tanck; Judit Wesseling; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 2.299

5.  The INIS Study. International Neonatal Immunotherapy Study: non-specific intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for suspected or proven neonatal sepsis: an international, placebo controlled, multicentre randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy for improving adherence to the guideline for prevention of mental ill-health among school personnel in Sweden: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Anna Toropova; Christina Björklund; Gunnar Bergström; Liselotte Schäfer Elinder; Kjerstin Stigmar; Charlotte Wåhlin; Irene Jensen; Lydia Kwak
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 7.327
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.