Literature DB >> 10325505

Use of animal models in defining efficacy of chemoprevention agents against prostate cancer.

M C Bosland1.   

Abstract

Animal models are crucial in preclinical efficacy testing of chemoprevention agents. The most feasible, realistic, and potentially effective target for prostate cancer chemoprevention is progression from prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) to histologic cancer and from histologic to clinically manifest cancer. There are transgenic mouse models for prostate cancer and models for PIN, but these have not yet been fully developed and evaluated for chemoprevention studies. Human prostate cancer xenografts in mice and transplantable Dunning rat prostate carcinomas can be used to assess tumor growth inhibition. Several Dunning tumors metastasize, enabling detection of inhibition of metastases. Detection of inhibitory effects on de novo prostate cancer development requires induction of a high cancer incidence and similarity of induced tumors to human prostate carcinomas. Transgenic mice with oncogenes expressed in a prostate-specific fashion, combined chronic treatment of NBL rats with estradiol-17beta and testosterone, and sequential treatment of rats with carcinogens such as N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) and chronic testosterone treatment all lead to a high incidence of prostatic adenocarcinomas. PIN occurs mostly in the former two models, and metastases are frequent in some transgenic models and the MNU-testosterone rat model. The latter model has been applied to chemoprevention agent efficacy testing. In 8 control groups, the carcinoma incidence was 77% in all accessory sex glands combined, 51% for small tumors confined to dorsolateral/anterior prostate, and 25% for large tumors of uncertain origin in the prostate area. This model was predictive of the lack of antiprostate cancer efficacy of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)all-trans-retinamide in humans. Thus, rats given MNU and chronic testosterone represent a relevant and reliable model for efficacy testing of chemoprevention agents. In conclusion, there are now adequate animal models for prostate cancer proven to be suitable for preclinical chemoprevention studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10325505     DOI: 10.1159/000019879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  11 in total

Review 1.  Estrogens and prostate cancer: etiology, mediators, prevention, and management.

Authors:  Shuk-Mei Ho; Ming-Tsung Lee; Hung-Ming Lam; Yuet-Kin Leung
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 2.  Regulation of NF-E2-related factor 2 signaling for cancer chemoprevention: antioxidant coupled with antiinflammatory.

Authors:  Rong Hu; Constance Lay-Lay Saw; Rong Yu; Ah-Ng Tony Kong
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Null activity of selenium and vitamin e as cancer chemopreventive agents in the rat prostate.

Authors:  David L McCormick; K V N Rao; William D Johnson; Maarten C Bosland; Ronald A Lubet; Vernon E Steele
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-02-09

Review 4.  A review of molecular events of cadmium-induced carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Joe Luevano; Chendil Damodaran
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.567

5.  The MNU Plus Testosterone Rat Model of Prostate Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Maarten C Bosland; Michael J Schlicht; Lori Horton; David L McCormick
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Phytoene, Phytofluene, and Lycopene from Tomato Powder Differentially Accumulate in Tissues of Male Fisher 344 Rats.

Authors:  Jessica K Campbell; Nancy J Engelmann; Mary Ann Lila; John W Erdman
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Long-term effects of perinatal exposure to low doses of cadmium on the prostate of adult male rats.

Authors:  Viviane P Santana; Évila S Salles; Deborah E Correa; Bianca F Gonçalves; Silvana G Campos; Luiz A Justulin; Antonio F Godinho; Wellerson R Scarano
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 8.  Chemoprevention of carcinoma prostate: a review.

Authors:  M S Ansari; N P Gupta; A K Hemal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Is There a Future for Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Maarten C Bosland
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-04-20

10.  Expression of lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 and relation with cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis on preneoplastic changes induced by cadmium chloride in the rat ventral prostate.

Authors:  Riánsares Arriazu; Esther Durán; José M Pozuelo; Luis Santamaria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.