Literature DB >> 10323652

The influence of physician race, age, and gender on physician attitudes toward advance care directives and preferences for end-of-life decision-making.

E W Mebane1, R F Oman, L T Kroonen, M K Goldstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether physicians' preferences for end-of-life decision-making differ between blacks and whites in the same pattern as patient preferences, with blacks being more likely than whites to prefer life-prolonging treatments.
DESIGN: A mailed survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: American Medical Association (AMA) and National Medical Association (NMA) databases. To enrich the sample of black physicians, we targeted physicians in the AMA database practicing in high minority area zip codes and graduates of the traditionally black medical schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported physician attitudes toward end-of-life decision-making and preference of treatment for themselves in persistent vegetative state or organic brain disease compared by race, controlling for age and gender.
RESULTS: The 502 physicians (28%) who returned the questionnaire included 280 white and 157 black physicians. With regard to attitudes toward patient care, 58% of white physicians agreed that tube-feeding in terminally ill patients is "heroic," but only 28 % of black physicians agreed with the statement (P < .001). White physicians were more likely than black physicians to find physician-assisted suicide an acceptable treatment alternative (36.6% vs 26.5% of black physicians) (P < .05). With regard to the physicians preferences for future treatment of themselves for the persistent vegetative state scenario, black physicians were more than six times more likely than white physicians to request aggressive treatments (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, or artificial feeding) for themselves (15.4% vs 2.5%) (P < .001). White physicians were almost three times as likely to want physician-assisted suicide (29.3% vs 11.8%) (P < .001) in this scenario. For a state of brain damage with no terminal illness, the majority of all physicians did not want aggressive treatment, but black physicians were nearly five times more likely than white physicians (23.0% vs 5.0%) (P < .001) to request these treatments. White physicians, on the other hand, were more than twice as likely to request physician-assisted suicide (22.5% vs 9.9%), P < .001 in this scenario.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians preferences for end-of-life treatment follow the same pattern by race as patient preferences, making it unlikely that low socioeconomic status or lack of familiarity with treatments account for the difference. Self-denoted race may be a surrogate marker for other, as yet undefined, factors. The full spectrum of treatment preferences should be considered in development of guidelines for end-of-life treatment in our diverse society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10323652     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02573.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  50 in total

1.  Factors affecting physicians' decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatments in terminal care.

Authors:  H Hinkka; E Kosunen; R Metsänoja; U-K Lammi; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Views of United States physicians and members of the American Medical Association House of Delegates on physician-assisted suicide.

Authors:  S N Whitney; B W Brown; H Brody; K H Alcser; J G Bachman; H T Greely
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Primary care residents' characteristics and motives for providing differential medical treatment of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Elva M Arredondo; Kathryn I Pollak; Philip Costanzo; Maya McNeilly; Evan Myers
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Determinants of treatment intensity for patients with serious illness: a new conceptual framework.

Authors:  Amy S Kelley; R Sean Morrison; Neil S Wenger; Susan L Ettner; Catherine A Sarkisian
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Racial variation in end-of-life intensive care use: a race or hospital effect?

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Zekarias Berhane; Lisa A Weissfeld; Chung-Chou H Chang; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The involvement of intensive care nurses in end-of-life decisions: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Kwok M Ho; Sonya English; Jeanette Bell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Frequency and correlates of advance planning among cognitively impaired older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer Hagerty Lingler; Karen B Hirschman; Linda Garand; Mary Amanda Dew; James T Becker; Richard Schulz; Steven T Dekosky
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.105

8.  End-of-life choices for African-American and white infants in a neonatal intensive-care unit: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kathryn L Moseley; Annamaria Church; Bridget Hempel; Harry Yuan; Susan Door Goold; Gary L Freed
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  What determines the timing of discussions on forgoing anticancer treatment? A national survey of medical oncologists.

Authors:  Masanori Mori; Chikako Shimizu; Asao Ogawa; Takuji Okusaka; Saran Yoshida; Tatsuya Morita
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Minor cognitive impairments in cancer patients magnify the effect of caregiver preferences on end-of-life care.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Holly G Prigerson; Eli L Diamond; Baohui Zhang; Alexi A Wright; Fremonta Meyer; Paul K Maciejewski
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.