Literature DB >> 10323609

Beta-haemolytic Streptococcus infection in burns.

R L Bang1, R K Gang, S C Sanyal, E M Mokaddas, A R Lari.   

Abstract

Group A beta haemolytic Streptococcus has been one of the most serious infections in the burn patients resulting in severe cellulitis and sepsis. Penicillin has been used ever since its introduction as prophylaxis against these conditions. Penicillin prophylaxis was used in our burn unit as well without any serious evaluation until December 1992. This prospective study was therefore, undertaken to evaluate the incidence of beta haemolytic Streptococcus infection in burn patients, and its clinical outcome over a period of 5 years in the absence of prophylaxis with penicillin. 14 of the 1213 burn patients admitted to the Al-Babtain Centre for Plastic Surgery and Burns from January 1993 to December 1997 had either colonization or infection with Streptococcus spp. Their mean age was 15 years (range 1 month to 52 years) and the mean burn surface area was 20% (range 5 to 90%). Streptococci were isolated from burn wounds in 10 patients, throat in 3 and blood culture in 1. Group A Streptococcus was found in 5, group C in 3 and group D in 6 patients. In all patients except one the organisms were isolated > or =72 h post burn. The infections were successfully controlled by antibiotic and no detrimental effect was observed either on wound healing or skin graft take. There was no mortality amongst these 14 patients. The study showed that only 1.1% of the burn patients in our unit acquired Streptococcus of which only one third comprised of group A. This study thus demonstrates that the practice of penicillin prophylaxis during the first five post burn days may not be of any value and therefore, deserves discontinuation in units where the incidence of this organism is minuscule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10323609     DOI: 10.1016/s0305-4179(98)00167-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  10 in total

1.  Burn mortality during 1982 to 1997 in Kuwait.

Authors:  R L Bang; P N Sharma; R K Gang; I E Ghoneim; M K Ebrahim
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Pattern of bacterial invasion in burn patients at the pakistan institute of medical sciences, islamabad.

Authors:  M Ahmad; S Shahid Hussain; M Ibrahim Khan; S A Malik
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2006-03-31

Review 3.  Management and prevention of drug resistant infections in burn patients.

Authors:  Roohi Vinaik; Dalia Barayan; Shahriar Shahrokhi; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 4.  Microbiology of the skin and the role of biofilms in infection.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Charlotte Emanuel; Keith F Cutting; David W Williams
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Burn wound infections.

Authors:  Deirdre Church; Sameer Elsayed; Owen Reid; Brent Winston; Robert Lindsay
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Epidemiology of burn injuries in the East Mediterranean Region: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nasih Othman; Denise Kendrick
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Epidemiology and outcome of burns at the Saud Al Babtain Burns, Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Center, Kuwait: our experience over five years (from 2006 to 2010).

Authors:  H A Khashaba; A N Al-Fadhli; K S Al-Tarrah; Y T Wilson; N Moiemen
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2012-12-31

8.  Infection control in severely burned patients.

Authors:  Yusuf Kenan Coban
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-08-04

9.  Therapeutic efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus against bacterial isolates from burn wounds.

Authors:  Mohammed Sh Jebur
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2010-12

10.  Success rate of split-thickness skin grafting of chronic venous leg ulcers depends on the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Trine Høgsberg; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Jens Schiersing Thomsen; Klaus Kirketerp-Møller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.